>>
Liz, Lynn, what is in a name? <<
If you don't even know whether the mother or the daughter is running for the U.S. Senate, I think it's a clear indicator that you're not informed enough about the candidates running for that senate seat to weigh in on which one Wyoming primary voters should choose. If someone didn't know whether Hillary or Bill Clinton was running against Obama in 2008, would you consider their opinion on the race?
>> your fixation about homosexual marriage <<
I posted two replies on this thread prior to this one – the first thread said nothing at all about homosexual marriage and discussed Liz Cheney's flip-flop on Syria and the stupidity of conservative activists who want to purge conservative Senators and re-elect liberal ones. The second thread pointed out that Enzi's critics don't even know whether Lynn or Liz is running for the Senate, and mentioned offhandedly that the candidate's mother is also liberal on issues like homosexual marriage. For that, you responded with a long defense of pro-gay marriage RINOs and claimed numerous times that I am “fixated” on the issue.
>> If your objection to Liz Cheney, or to her mother for that matter, is that they "support" homosexual marriage, ( because an accident of genes has given them a homosexual sister and daughter), to the exclusion of other issues <<
You begin using a liberal premise here, that people in gay relationships are born that way because of an “accident of genes”. Needless to say, I disagree. But getting back on topic, Liz Cheney's problems go far beyond her liberal record on gay issues. The fact she's running as the “more conservative” candidate in the primary but has a proven record of being more liberal than him should be a huge red flag for any objective conservative.
>> Most Americans, including myself, are a lot less interested with what adults do voluntarily and in private <<
Again with the liberal talking points.... evil social conservatives want to use the government to regulate what goes on in the bedroom. In reality, I could care less what Mary Cheney and her lesbian “partner” do “behind closed doors, in private”. They can be together until their dying day and screw til the cows come home. But I do care that they are trying to use the federal (and state governments) to MANDATE that I call their sick relationship a “marriage”, and want to use taxpayers money to celebrate it PUBLICLY, and force churches and religious institutions to “marry” them when it's biologically impossible for such a relationship to form a “marriage”.
>> a lot more concerned with hypocritical, posturing senators selling us out in Washington. <<
Liz Cheney fits that definition to a tee (she's a celebrity because of her posturing on Fox News, and she hypocritically takes numerous positions that do not reflect what she does in real life). So how would electing her to the Senate solve that problem?
>> That train has left the station. <<
So we should reward the people who helped give the left the momentum to make it happen? Roe v. Wade left the station 40 years ago and abortion-on-demand is now the law of the land. Would you want to elect Republicans to the Senate who pushed for it before it became reality?
>> They (the Libs abetted or at least passively condoned by Rinos) are tearing the Constitution to shreds, they are bankrupting America, they are spying on every one of us, they are using the government against us <<
And as they've been doing that, Mike Enzi has stood shoulder-to-shoulder with us over 95% of the time, being a staunch ally of Senators like Lee and Cruz, being a reliable conservative vote on the biggest hot button issues of the day like amnesty, gub rights, Obamacare, tax cuts, government spending, etc., etc. No, he's not perfect 100% of the time, but nobody is except Jesus. What is with your fixation on purging Senators who are on the right side of those battles? How does replacing a conservative Republican Senator with a LESS conservative one "save our Republic"? Did replacing Jon Kyl with Jeff Flake improve the Senate? Why not go after liberals and RINOs instead? There are plenty of them up for re-election that NOBODY is running against.
If you don't even know whether the mother or the daughter is running for the U.S. Senate, I think it's a clear indicator that you're not informed enough about the candidates running for that senate seat Come on.
In your reply directed at me your specific objections to Liz Cheney was that she supported homosexual marriage. You should not be surprised that I responded to that. In this reply you say:
she hypocritically takes numerous positions that do not reflect what she does in real life
And previously you said she:
has a proven record of being more liberal than him
I don't buy how to respond to unsupported allegations. If you have evidence that in fact she is hypocritical or has supported liberal clauses other than homosexuality bring it on and if it holds water I might well change my position. Meanwhile, I await facts.
