Posted on 10/08/2013 11:06:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
While on Fox News Sunday, commentator George Will uttered an underappreciated truth about the internal politics of the GOP. More specifically, he pointed out that the rift between conservative and liberal factions of the Republican Party is nothing to worry about. . . Unless you are a Democrat.
The Republicans now have what liberals are supposed to admire, which is diversity, except liberals don't want diversity in thought, and that's what the Republicans now have.
More truthful words are rarely uttered on national television. In their typical, hyper-inflammatory nature, Democrats simultaneously demonize the Republican Party as being “at war with itself”, and of being monolithically radical. C’mon Dems. . . Most of you are products of public universities: Weren’t you ever taught the definition of “oxymoron”?
Truth be told, Republicans have long been the “Big Tent” party. There is more intellectual diversity in the GOP than on most public Universities, Labor Union leadership panels, or environmental think tanks. For as much as I despise the liberal progressive bent of some GOP members, they do serve as a counterpoint in the conversation over the appropriate role of government. Within the current GOP is the debate that, at one time, consumed members of both parties. On one side there are limited government conservatives, opposed by bigger government technocrats.
Between the wing of Olympia Snowe, and the wing of Rand Paul, the Republican Party is having the exact conversation that should be occurring on a national level between the GOP and Democrats: The choice between efficient government (arguably another oxymoron), and less government. The problem is that Democrats have largely abandoned this discussion in favor of more government. . . As if efficiency, effectiveness, and purpose (not to mention Constitutional limitations) have no place in the conversation.
And while I certainly do not relish the thought of more Chris Christies in the GOP, the truth is they are welcome (as are more Marco Rubios) because they serve as a more amicable alternative to the increasingly government-obsessed Democrat Party. Even Mitt Romney wouldn’t have allowed the monstrosity-that-is-Obamacare to roll out with such potential for financial, technological, and implemental troubles. (And, let’s face it: The Governor that brought Romneycare into existence isn’t exactly a radical right-wing Republican.)
The Democrats, by contrast, can’t quite wrap their mind around having a public inter-party conversation on the direction of the Nation. To the extent that disagreements exist within the Democrat Party (and they certainly do – just look at the issue of gun control, or abortion) they are largely kept quiet by party leadership and the left-leaning media. When a John McCain, or Olympia Snow, vote with Democrats it is headline news, and described as the art of bi-partisanship. When moderate Democrats side with Republicans, on the other hand, it is referred to as “party abandonment” and can only be found on the back pages of the Wall Street Journal.
Such disdain for inter-party discourse, however, is understandable. After all, there is a self-defeating aspect to being the “Big Tent” Party and welcoming debate within its ranks. . . The Cruz’s and the McCain’s will always be “at war” with one another. The greatest intellectual asset of the Republican Party is also its greatest handicap when going up against an opposition party that is portrayed as being unified and focused on narrow narratives.
Such intellectual diversity, by its very nature, impresses upon its members a sense of intellectual honesty. Where the Democrats are careful to control their message, and ideological narrative, Republicans are having an open conversation about the merit of their ideas and the purpose of government. Even if that conversation occurs within their own rank and file, it is a dialogue that otherwise would be absent in today’s political theater.
The internal debate within the Republican Party is also nothing new, unprecedented, or dangerous. In fact, such disagreements between fairly progressive, and fairly conservative, members of the Party has been ongoing since the early years of the 20th century. As Barry Goldwater (who was at odds with the Rockefeller Republicans) once said, “When asked if I belonged to an organized political party, I had to say no. . . After all: I belong to the Republican party.”
I know the battle between the RINO’s and the Conservatives has been going on at least back to 1976 when the “Rockefeller Republican” wing and the “Reagan Wing” were going at it just as hard as they are today.
GOP divergence of opinion reported as
shameful and a sign of their imminent
demise.
Rats divergence of opinion is
healthy debate.
Under Bush it was heroic to oppose
the federal govt.
Under Obama it is criminal and racist.
What is new is that both sides are fighting. Until recently, most of the conservatives took their beating and did what they were told.
Now that George Will is on Fox News I have a question:
Will Will be willing to will Williams to willingly, really willingly, will himself to willfully give up his liberal Talking Points rants?
I doubt it. If he does I might forgive him for his ABC News transgressions which are too numerous to list. At least willfully.
Over time, individuals begin to pine
for what the Repyoobs have: the ability
to voice one’s opinion without ad hominem
attacks.
Unless of course our current educational
system has its way: to make brother-love
the only “right” way to think.
Welcome to the Shrug.
Yeah, but look at our last election. I mean, come on! The guy was pro nationalized health care, pro gay agenda in the military and adopting kids, pro abortion in his actions, pro environmentalism and carbon cap and trade, and pro liberal activist judges. He was. You can look it up. Voting for him was as nuts as voting for Obama! At least Dubya had some redeeming attributes, and McCain had Palin.
No, the battle has come to a head.
Goes back even further to the early 30's...Hooverites vs. conservatives.
One big reason FDR won.
We have had two notable plateaus, during the Coolidge and Reagan years, when the damage to Conservatives stalled out or moderated.
But the damage is NEVER reversed, not even fractionally.
In the long term, the Progressives always win.
The debate between Republicans really is different this time.
Conservatives can barely find traces of the country they once knew and loved.
I, for one, am at the breaking point.
There are no more compromises I am willing to make.
I will no longer tolerate the betrayal and sabotage and political incompetence of the RINO’s.
If Republicans can't stop ObamaCare and Amnesty, I will vote third party, or stay home on election day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.