Posted on 10/06/2013 12:04:43 PM PDT by neverdem
How did the Republican Party become so splintered and so infused with hard-line conservatives?
Don't blame redistricting. Don't chalk it up to anti-Obama fervor.
Republicans have become an unruly bunch of scorched-earth conservatives because the Tea Party smashed the business lobby's monopoly on GOP fundraising.
Here's a story of where the GOP used to be:
Back in 2006, I asked a couple of conservative Republican congressmen to give blurbs for my book on corporate welfare. My boss loves the book, one of their top aides said, but were not going to put his name on it." Why not, I asked. "Who do you think funds his campaigns?" she whispered. "Its not the Family Research Council.
In short, the conservative congressman was happy to fight the good fight, but he wasnt willing to upset Big Business because thats where the checks came from and no checks meant no re-election.
Back then, to raise money, Republicans had to go to K Street. Call your former chief of staff who was now at a lobbying firm, have him host a fundraiser. Your ex-aide would show up with colleagues carrying $2,500 checks and with corporate clients handing over $5,000 checks from their political action committees.
Although K Street was the road to campaign cash, the party leadership was often the path to K Street. This helps explain the power dynamic in the pre-Tea Party GOP.
But the Tea Party smashed K Street's monopoly on Republican fundraising. The Club for Growth was founded in the late 1990s, and early last decade, it began targeting liberal Republicans in primaries. By 2010, the Club had become a giant force, raising money for candidates who met its rigorous ideological tests and pouring millions into independent expenditures against less-favored Republicans and Democrats.
In 2009, Sen. Jim DeMint founded the Senate Conservatives Fund. The thinking was this: The job of the party leadership was to elect Republicans to the Senate, no matter what. DeMint wanted conservative Republicans.
Instead of corporate interests filling Republican coffers, ideological money started coming in, too.
While GOP leaders backed candidates like Charlie Crist (Fla.), Trey Grayson (Ky.), and Sue Lowden (Colo.) in 2010 primaries, the SCF backed Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, and Sharron Angle. K Street and the National Republican Senatorial Committee worked hand-in-hand -- but for a change, there was a countervailing force.
Consider the Kentucky primary that year.
With Mitch McConnell's help, Grayson raised half a million dollars from business PACs, including Obamacare backers like Pfizer and the American Hospital Association, bailout beneficiaries like the American Bankers Association and the Managed Funds Association and Beltway bandits like Northrop Grumman. At least a dozen lobbying firms and industry trade groups funded Grayson. Republican senators-turned-lobbyists like Trent Lott backed Grayson, warning, "We don't want a lot of Jim DeMint disciples."
Rand Paul, meanwhile, pocketed only $25,000 in PAC money before the primary. Where did Paul get his loot?
The Club for Growth was Paul's biggest source of funds, giving him $105,000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The Senate Conservatives Fund kicked in $36,685. These two groups, together with FreedomWorks, also spent big on independent expenditures for Paul.
Ted Cruz also came to Washington by defeating K Street. The Club for Growth spent more than $2.5 million helping Cruz in the Texas GOP primary, while the SCF spent about $800,000. K Street was backing Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst -- he got $500,000 from business PACs (33 times Cruz's take), and GOP lobbyists hosted a fundraiser for him at the Capitol Hill townhouse of Democratic superlobbyist Tony Podesta.
As Cruz put it, Everyone who makes their living from continuing the government-spending gravy train is supporting Dewhurst.
If not from lobbyists and big businesses, where are these Tea Party groups getting their money? Mostly from small-business owners and conservative retirees. The Club for Growth has a big chunk of wealthy investors cutting them checks.
It may confuse liberals who think free-market politics is just a corrupt deal to enrich Big Business or who claim that the Tea Party is a Big Business front but these are the opposing pulls in the GOP: K Street and the Tea Party.
Having two sources of money changes the party dramatically.
I don't think there's a way for Wall Street to punish the 25 to 50 hardcore House Republicans, one Wall Street lobbyist told Politico in the first couple days of the shutdown. Referring to an anti-establishment libertarian freshman congressman, the lobbyist said, I don't think Justin Amash cares if Bank of America gives to him or not.
A Republican who doesnt care about Bank of America checks wasnt possible before the Tea Party.
If sticking to your beliefs is "hard line", what do they the Zero King?
Agreed. This is not about the Republicans. It is about the democrats turning into pure evil.
In real personal experience the Democrats have a more direct relationship with organized crime, mob pols, dirty money crooked unions and yes, lobbyists, than Republicans could ever hope to have.
Good piece. The problem is that some of the tea party supported politicians try to have it both ways. Rubio was elected with a lot of tea party support, but now he is owned by special interests. A lot of new members in the House are playing the same game.
This article made me so happy, I’ll be smiling the rest of the week because of it.
Hey, Examiner, good going on making us sound like Sandinistas or the Muslim Brotherhood.
that a$$ turd Karl Rove spent a billion and what did it get him? contract renewal at Fox
I think you can't be more specific, huh.
What special interests specifically?
Betcha conservative working (not in government)taxpayers are among your "special interests."
Rubio is Juan McInsane’s new amnesty bitch...
It’s not that bad. Rubio is reliable on several fronts, but his state is going purple via the flow of Escape from New York types.
Translation, The only good Republican is one that totally agrees with the democraps take over of America.
You’ll love this book:
Obama’s Cook County Democratic Party was founded by a murderer, pimp, bootlegger and his associates. That’s Chicago.
You seem to be in denial RE Rubio. It’s well known who is bankrolling Rubio to pimp amnesty. Farming (sugar, etc.), tourism (hotels) and so on. All the special interests that want a full supply of slave labor. Rubio got a boatload of cash from FL corporations and he is doing their bidding. No need to be in denial about it.
Was reading earlier in the week about the pharmaceutical industry and its interest in ‘slave labor’ and the coincidence of some republicans tepid view of govt health insurance.
Crony capitalism is phony capitalism.
Remember that when these businesses funded the GOP, the party worked for them, not conservatives. And many of these corporations were not entirely loyal to the US, but had and have an internationalist bent.
Therefore, I don’t see much reason to be entirely loyal to their well being either. For instance, if a conservative government passes laws that bring back industry and jobs to the US, I am not going to be upset if these corporations see a lower bottom line, because they have to pay higher wages.
Far too many corporations have been willing to make a fast buck betting on the decline of America, and supporting Democrat politicians who want to bring that about.
Was reading earlier in the week about the pharmaceutical industry and its interest in slave labor and the coincidence of some republicans tepid view of govt health insurance.
It’s clear the GOP is not All In on the obamacare fight. I am currently getting carpet bombed in FL with common core ads. No PR campaign about the kenyancare/shut down battle from the GOP. Why is it Bloomberg can run attack ads at a Dem Senator over the 2A but the NRSC can’t be bothered to engage vulnerable Dems on kenyancare?
Obamacare is just another campaign issue to the GOPe. They had to be dragged into this battle. The Dems will fight a political death match for it. Guess who will win?
I will say, the Democrats out-network us a gazillion to one.
They have the unions locked up, or vise versa.
They have all the government agencies lined up in a row.
They have an almost absolute lock on the nation’s media.
They have our universities locked up.
They have all of our public K-12th grade schools locked up.
And now they want us locked up...
“...us locked up” may get kind of tricky in my two states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.