Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fallacious Claims Prop Up Ethanol
Townhall.com ^ | October 6, 2013 | Paul Driessen

Posted on 10/06/2013 8:55:20 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2013 8:55:20 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just another scam. Just look at what has happened to the price of corn....any questions??


2 posted on 10/06/2013 9:00:59 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
ethanol is for drinking


3 posted on 10/06/2013 9:02:05 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s a scam to pour money into the coffers of agribusiness and from there to politicians.

The people pay for it with higher prices as the government forces them to burn their grain rather than letting them and their livestock eat it.


4 posted on 10/06/2013 9:10:27 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is dangerous to food supplies to mandate burning grain as motor vehicle fuel instead of burning something that cannot be food. At the very least, the law should be amended to allow suspending the mandate when the value of grain as a fuel becomes so far out of sync with its value as a food.


5 posted on 10/06/2013 9:11:47 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here in Gulf Coast Florida we are being plagued by a smarmy TV Ad, “Mr Slick and Dummy” done by “Growth Energy”, a pro-ethanol trade group. As to expected from an advocacy ad, it is totally one-sided but when the intelligent consumer knows the background, it is even more icky than usual. Worse it gets the stamp of approval from many eco groups who should know better.


6 posted on 10/06/2013 9:13:53 AM PDT by SES1066 (To expect courteous government is insanity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I have an '02 Toyota whose "check engine" lights if I use gasoline with ethanol. Once the light comes on, it takes many tanks of non-ethanol gasoline to turn it off. My daughter has an '07 Lincoln SUV that behaves the same way. Fortunately, there is a goodly supply of non-ethanol gas locally.

In my opinion, this love of ethanol is somewhat akin to a belief in ghosts.

7 posted on 10/06/2013 9:14:38 AM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It pollutes more, has less energy than gasoline thus lowering mpg, and ups the cost of gasoline at the pump.

Here’s a great website that lists ethanol-free gasoline stations.
http://pure-gas.org/


8 posted on 10/06/2013 9:14:49 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ethanol does not burn clean at all. But it is made from Corn=— key element of the politics.... food, commodities, corn lobby and bioengineering (monsanto/bayer).

Methanol (wood alcohol, made from anything with cellulose) burns clean.. does not have these effects on engines (dragsters use it btw) and can be made by ANYONE with knowledge. The idea of grass clippings, wood chips etc.

Ethanol lobby, corn lobby, using petro fertilizers and massive amounts of what could be drinking water to make— a fuel dilutent that does not burn clean to our air— what sheer idiocy.

Make methanol at home, buy 100% gasoline and dilute it yourself. Ethanol is and was a scam— massive BS.


9 posted on 10/06/2013 9:15:42 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In a world where babies still starve, using food for fuel, in a nation that has as much coal and natural gas as we have, is obscene.


10 posted on 10/06/2013 9:17:43 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

One one hand we hear how we can not sustain increase in population then we make laws that require us to burn our food. Who does that??? Crazy liberals, thats who.

The whole story sounds like a inflated analogy for something bad. This is like its own absurd analogy. You can’t come up with a more crazy comparison.


11 posted on 10/06/2013 9:19:03 AM PDT by pennyfarmer (Your socialist beat our liberal AGAIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Junk science = Junk solutions = Junk fuel and excuse to pad the pockets of a whole lot of people.

The farm belt has had an energy boom for the last decade. It has been wonderful and a resurrection of the last failed ethanol initiative.

Lots of companies and people prosper... I don’t mind earned prosperity but this is all artificial and comes on the backs of taxpayers and consumers. It is nothing but a convenient gift to agriculture.

Farmers have become rich. Farmers who did OK have hit the jackpot at the expense of many others

Farm equipment manufacturers have done very well and prices for equipment are outrageous.

ADM and Cargill have made a fortune

Farm land prices have exploded

Food costs have exploded

The land is being raped by corn... to get these yields is not much more than hydroponics

The runoff is laced with nitrates and chemicals... how much pollution has been prevented... none. I venture to say the result is a net gain in pollution.


12 posted on 10/06/2013 9:20:53 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Los Angeles SMOG problem was horrendous before additives like ethanol were added to that area's gasoline.

Check it out at http://green.autoblog.com/2012/08/22/la-smog-has-less-of-a-chokehold-than-years-ago-noaa-study-says/

13 posted on 10/06/2013 9:21:56 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I doubt that many farmers are making much of this $B boondoggle. One sideline is that auto parts makers are selling more fuel pumps and carburetor parts because of the damage done by alcohol. The diaphragm in my atv only lasts a few months with this solvent in the gas. I found that I can repair it with a made in china mechanics glove which beats the $100 parts replacement. The first time I put 4% alcohol in my old truck I had to replace my fuel pump.
14 posted on 10/06/2013 10:15:51 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
(Fears of petroleum)"Many are rooted in anti-hydrocarbon worldviews".

Won't the Carbon Idiots have a fit when they discover that alcohol IS a hydrocarbon?

15 posted on 10/06/2013 10:30:47 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

The air in Los Angeles got considerably cleaner way before the introduction of alcohol in the gasoline. Smaller,lighter cars, more efficient internal combustion engines were the real reason.


16 posted on 10/06/2013 10:37:59 AM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Minutemen
The air in Los Angeles got considerably cleaner way before the introduction of alcohol in the gasoline. Smaller,lighter cars, more efficient internal combustion engines were the real reason.

Just noticed that you're in Oregon.

I grew up in LA and remember the days when trash wasn't picked up ... we had backyard firepits. And then along came the post WW-II baby boom and population numbers went up and up. The smog wan't all that bad in WW-II days, but the smog later became bothersome. So fire-pits were banned, trast pickup started; the population boom went on; freeways arrived, and both went on and on ... leading to a massive automobile smog problem ... Solved with additives added to gasoline.

Today, auto mileage in LA is about 10% less than auto mileage using gas bought outside the LA area.

17 posted on 10/06/2013 11:44:51 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer; John S Mosby; muir_redwoods; theBuckwheat
This article is behind the times.

The first cellulosic alcohol plants are being built so it is a matter of time as the technology further develops that corn will be replaced by switch grass and kudzu.

18 posted on 10/06/2013 11:51:45 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Fine, if the “alcohol” is methanol, wood alcohol as the goal not something that creates ethanol.


19 posted on 10/06/2013 3:51:33 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Large amounts of methanol can harm synthetic fuel system components. Be careful especially with older engines.


20 posted on 10/06/2013 9:10:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson