[freedumb2003]

>> Instead, researchers are now discovering that organisms robustly adapt to their habitats while clearly remaining within their biblical kind.<<

Since there is no scientific concept of “biblical kind” this statement is meaningless, as is the rest of the article.

[thepoodlebites]

>> Instead, researchers are now discovering that organisms robustly adapt to their habitats while clearly remaining within their biblical kind.

>Since there is no scientific concept of “biblical kind” this statement is meaningless, as is the rest of the article.

Biblical kind is “species.” Just because a different taxonomy is used doesn’t mean it isn’t scientific. While you are at it Google real ad hoc, i.e., non scientific sub-theories associated with Darwinian evolution:
1. panspermia (life came from outer space)
2. punctuated equilibrium (short duration speedups in macroevolution)
3. horizontal gene transfer (species shared genes horizontally early in the development of life, in violation of the rules of macroevolution).

Enjoy,

-Frank

[coincheck]

How is this article meaningless?? I am just curious. :)