When an earlier thread on this came up I tried to find something out about this Gentry. They have her hidden pretty good. So my guess is she's a Democrat zealot.
Does anyone need more evidence that “shall not be infringed” means what it says and that gun law in and of itself is infringement. In plain words, unrestricted concealed or open carry would leave government to argue over other issues than the second amendment.
Thanks for posting. I occasionally visit Arkansas and the confusion had me confused and worried a bit.
I have a “Georgia Weapons Carry License”.
A handgun is a weapon, a weapon is not necessarily a handgun.
Thus, the differentiation is pointless, as “weapon” includes handguns and all other weapons without differentiation.
Logically, there would only be a problem if the law stated “concealed handgun” and the question was whether reciprocity included a concealed blackjack, knife, tomahawk, etc.
I am an AR resident and am still confused, along with many others I might add, about the wording of the new law. The concealed handgun part is not the problem. Whether one can carry open (So called Constitutional Carry) is a matter of interpretation. It essential says, in normal Arkansas speak, that a person can carry a handgun anytime as long as no criminal intent is involved. However, if you want to carry concealed you must have a permit. That sounds like open carry to me. I am still looking for a attorney’s interpretation of this new law. Any ideas out there in AR country?
Does any State have/issue concealed knife permits?
Nice to see they still can’t read the 2nd with any comprehension?
Wonder how much ‘honor’ they have with Alaska, Arizona, etc.?
In fact, I want to know when the reciprocity of those States will filter down into FL and the others?