>> Eh, yeah, whatever. I’m focused on the relevant issue:
FWIW, you’re going to have a hard time dancing around the “homosexual agenda” at FR especially when advancing Libertarian candidates.
I stand in defense of conservative libertarianism which is a challenge. Defending liberal-libertarianism will prove to be impossible.
If the GOP would do its job and actually BE conservative libertarian instead of bashing them at every turn, the liberal libertarians wouldn’t be a problem.
But then the GOP would actually be a true alternative second party instead of a “we can do statism too but with more efficiency”, lip service to pro life and border control, wing of the Progressive Democrats.