And from your URL, I quote:
“I noted that I had nothing against Enzi, and that I didn’t know much about him.”
Yea, that’s a real compelling argument made against Enzi right there.
See, the difference between me and a Ivy League law professor is that a) I actually live in Wyoming, and b) see/hear/read a lot more of both Enzi and Cheney that doesn’t make the national news.
Anyone who thinks Lizzie Cheney is an improvement over Enzi is smoking dope. Period, full stop, end of discussion. You have to be delusional to believe Cheney isn’t an establishment Republican. I find their desire for “another Cruz” and their support of Cheney to be a cognitive dissonance so huge, it causes my head to explode.
I read it. It’s an old article. It gives no valid reasons for electing an establishment carpetbagger Liz Cheney. If you’re so desperate to be rid of one of the 19 Senators who stood up to the Zero-Reid-McConnell bipartisan big government axis, why wouldn’t you be in favor of drafting Congresswoman Cynthia Lummis ? She actually is from Wyoming, not from inside the beltway of Northern Virginia.
More bashing of Enzi and no defense of the indefensible Liz. He’s a backbencher, yes I agree, that is a valid criticism.
Liz would be a GOPE frontbencher. You prefer that? I do not.
You ARE for Liz right?
Or are you for the 3rd candidate, that neo-nazi treasure hunter or whatever he is?