Posted on 09/25/2013 5:10:34 AM PDT by Kaslin
Ted Cruz is no Joe McCarthy, as so many liberals bizarrely claim. But he might be the conservative Barack Obama.
The charge that he's the new McCarthy is something of a compliment from liberals. It means they don't like him, can't really explain why and need to demonize him instead. In other words, he must be doing something right.
For conservatives, the comparison to Obama probably stings more than the McCarthyite smear.
But think about it. Both men have impeccable educational credentials. Obama went to Occidental College, transferred to Columbia University and got his law degree from Harvard. Cruz went to Princeton University, where he was a national champion debater, and got a law degree from Harvard. Cruz's legal career was objectively more impressive than Obama's. He clerked on the appellate court and for Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. He held numerous prestigious jobs in and out of government. Like Obama, he taught law, but Cruz was also the solicitor general of Texas and argued before the Supreme Court nine times.
National Review editor Rich Lowry identified one plausible source of elite liberal hatred for Cruz: betrayal. "Cruz is from the intellectual elite, but not of it, a tea party conservative whose politics are considered gauche at best at the storied universities where he studied. He is, to borrow the words of the 2009 H.W. Brands biography of FDR, a traitor to his class." (I hate to correct my boss, but Brands didn't coin that phrase).
What liberals hate in Cruz, they love in Obama: a product of an elite education who confirms all their feelings of superiority. Obama took the desiccated ideas of campus liberalism and made them seem vibrant, stylish and even populist.
There are other similarities. But the most relevant one comes in their similar approach to politics (not political philosophy, where they are light years apart).
Both landed in the U.S. Senate, running with larger ambitions in mind and promising to be unstinting champions of their party's principles.
Moreover, both grasp that historically the Senate whittles away presidential timber. Like John F. Kennedy, Obama was there just long enough to run for president. And while Obama was there, his chief goal was burnishing his presidential image, not racking up legislative accomplishments. Cruz has been a senator for eight months, and he already looks like a presidential contender.
In 2012, Obama said the "most important lesson" of his first term was that "you can't change Washington from the inside." You need populist pressure from the outside. This was an odd claim on two counts. First, it's not true. His signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act, was an entirely inside affair, an ugly partisan one involving mercenary horse-trading and countless backroom deals with industry and unions. Second, Obama, the community organizer, always believed salvation lay in organizing a movement. It was the premise at the heart of his 2008 campaign in which he told adoring throngs, "We are the ones we've been waiting for." It says something about Obama's arrogance that his biggest lesson from his first term was that he was right all along.
Still, this conviction led Obama to turn his presidential campaign into a private political army intended to rally his base for his legislative agenda. That effort has failed utterly. Organizing for Action couldn't even organize a congressional vote on gun control, never mind a win.
Cruz's fight to defund Obamacare rests on a similar outsider approach using the Tea Party and allied groups. As he recently told radio host Hugh Hewitt, "The strategy on this all along has been directed not towards Washington but towards the American people. It has been directed towards building a grassroots tsunami."
If Cruz's effort fails -- and I fear it will -- it will be for the same reasons that Obama's second term has been such a legislative dud. The way you bring change to Washington is through elections. After the elections, change comes from the unsightly process of consensus-building (aka sausage-making). Both Cruz and Obama have shown little interest in that approach.
Of course, there are huge differences between Obama and Cruz -- the most important is that they have completely divergent philosophies. That matters most, but it isn't everything. The inside game matters too. Cruz likes pointing out Obama's failures; he should also learn from them.
“Ted Cruz, the GOP’s Obama”
Hardly ! Cruz has a real brain and can form complete thoughts all by himself w/o a teleprompter.
Apples and oranges. Cruz actually is intelligent. I bet he even knows how many states we have and where the Atlantic and Gulf are.
FUBO
There has never been any proof that any of this is true. We have seen pictures of him when he was at Occidental. We have been told he was at the Harvard Law Review. Where are the grades?? For ANY higher learning institution?
It is the GOP which is like Obama.
Sen. Cruz is NOTHING like Obama or the miserable GOP.
THE GOP is a FRAUD.
THE GOP LIES without shame.
THE GOP supports DeathCARE.
THE GOP backstabs EVERYONE.
THE GOP cannot be trusted.
Sen. Cruz is NOTHING like Obama or the miserable GOP.
I would take the “Mc Carthy” comparison as somewhat of a compliment. Drunken, boorish, and destructive as he was, ultimately, history, as in records opened after the fall of the USSR, has shown that Mc Carthy was actually right.
Both men have impeccable educational credentials
..........................................................
WTF???????
Where has he author of this BS been hiding?
We have no idea about Obama’s educational credits. Only what he claims.
Did anyone actually see him at Columbia?
He has spent Millions to hide his records.
Whoever wrote this is full of Dung.
The names “Cruz” and “Obama” don’t belong together in the same sentence. “Cruz” needs a shower afterwards.
Blech!
Ha ha, that's the first thing I thought, too. I would love to see the Columbia transcripts. Absolutely nobody from his class remembers him.
Does Goldberg really believe that tripe about Obama’s academic credentials, when there is no proof he ever excelled at his various universities and published nothing while at the Harvard Law Review?
Obama got where he is by affirmative action, white liberal guilt, and conservative cowardice. He is a living example of the Peter Principle. He’s not fit to do Sen. Cruz’s laundry.
What an insult to Ted Cruz and the GOP to make such a vile statement as Senator Cruz being the “GOP’s Obama.” Insulting Indeed!
The big difference I see is when Obama say “We”, he is talking about the government. When Cruz says “We”, he is talking about the people.
I'll bet you that folks at Princeton remember him.
Not bad
I fear that Jonah has become an "inside the beltway" guy.
Imagine Obama speaking all night on the floor of the Senate without a teleprompter. Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, .... Sheesh.
This article is suuuuuch BS. If Obama graduated from ANYTHING, why can’t he produce the paperwork?
Makes my stomach turn to read this.
“Both men have impeccable educational credentials.”
What a load of crap! Obama did absolutely nothing to “earn” his degrees. There is no equivalence in their educational credentials.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.