CNN Anchor Says Founding Fathers Would Oppose Defunding ObamaCare Because It's a 'Law'

http://mrc.org ^ | September 19, 2013 | Matt Hadro

[BenLurkin]

So was the Stamp Act.

[EQAndyBuzz]

So was DOMA.

What’s their point?

[Sarah Barracuda]

The 2nd Amendment is the law, doesn’t stop the libs from trying to abolish it constantly

[GeronL]

bump

[Rashputin]

Oh, but they would approve of not enforcing laws if Holder and King Barry don’t like those laws.

[Viennacon]

The Founders would not have opposed the British taxation laws because ‘they were laws’. lol

[darkwing104]

So was Slavery

[tallyhoe]

What good is a law if you don’t enforce it fully!!!!

[grania]

How are they supposed to fund something that’s not the law? This idiot is saying the HOR has now power. Geeesh

[mrsmith]

Good article. To the point, thorough and precise.

[llevrok]

Obama openly disregarded parts of ObamaCare (5 at last count). That makes this an invalid law in my book and open season to TOTALY disobey it.

[Jim Robinson]

B/S. Nothing follows.

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

Liberals have always had a great respect for the law.

Pfffft...

[USNBandit]

Nice shot

[Jonty30]

So was throwing tea overboard into the Boston Harbour.

[Huskrrrr]

Proponents of Obamacare are running out of arguments.

[Palio di Siena]

How about unenforced illegal immigration laws?

[Monorprise]

The Boston Tea party was also as illegal as their being taxed without representation was legal.

I am increasingly forced to observe that the key difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals feel oppressed by nature(the laws of God) whereas conservatives feel only oppressed by Government(the acts of men) usually at the behest of ‘liberals’.

Our founders felt oppressed as Conservative do today, where as pretty much nobody felt the liberal concept of oppression was even sane.

[tumblindice]

So are the Immigration and Nationality statutes.