[Diogenesis]

Tyrant’s Gun-Walking Attorney General:
”This is not your parents' America.
Tomorrow, by your King's Executive Order
ONLY terrorists and the IRS will have guns
and DO"J" protection."

[KC_Lion]

Ping to Sarah's Awesome List!

If a Society morally deteriorates into Apathy, Blinding and Ignorance, than any who stand up to save it will cast out by the very people they wish to save.

Not Sarah, Not Ted Cruz, no one can save us if are not willing to save ourselves.

If we let Emperor OBamamus Maximums destroy us, it will be because we took his offer of Government Cheese, rather than pay the price of Freedom, which is eternal vigilance.

[ConorMacNessa]

I hate too be flagrantly obvious, but don't you suppose that at least one of those victims would have had a chance if he or she were armed?

A multiple murder occurs in a city with among the most stringent gun laws and the gun-grabbers are positively salivating, if not frothing at the mouth.

A similar situation in Baltimore - Maryland's gun laws are ridiculously strict and ensure that law-abiding citizens will not be allowed to have guns but street thugs and other criminals will.

And I almost forgot Chicago, that gem of the Midwest, where human life matters not a whit, where there are exceedingly tough gun laws, and where the carnage in the streets is worse than in an actual war-zone.

Send me to Afghanistan - I think I have a better chance there!

America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi!

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

[Taxman]

Thanks for this post.

We must encourage Mrs. Palin to stay in the arena!

[onedoug]

Sell out our Liberty sell out our soul.

[Graewoulf]

” - - - Once again, in the aftermath of a shooting, a new installment of the debate about gun laws has broken out. - - - “

Yup, and once again the Liberal Agenda Media is shifting our attention away from the correct laws:

1. ) The Right of Americans to bear arms.

2.) The stupid 1992 law that prohibits loaded guns inside of a US Military building.

BTW, “the best defense against a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.”

[Diogenesis]

The Tyrant-by-Fraud did not even pledge the US flag.

Is there ANYONE surprised he came in with Hasan,
and since in office has defended the Cole terrorists,
the Saudis connected with Boston Atrocity,
and the al Qaeda (even arming them)?

[Bratch]

CNN’s Don Lemon recently saw the light on this issue and highlighted the Centers for Disease Control study showing that so-called military assault rifles account for a small fraction of gun violence. The overwhelming majority of gun-related deaths are inflicted with handguns, but a ban on handguns is not only politically untenable; it would also hinder the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves (especially Americans who live in troubled urban areas where the police are slow to respond to emergency calls).

Instead of offering real solutions based on facts, reactionary politicians offer us the politics of emotion, which is the opposite of leadership. It is the manipulation of the people by the political class for their own political ends. It is so very self-serving, but, worse, it is destructive.

The first thing politicians ask after these tragedies is essentially: “What can we do to limit the freedom of the people?”

And that is the wrong question. The question we should be asking is: “What can we do to nurture and support a people capable of living in freedom?”

Has any other public figure asked this question?

Because instead of worrying about how many legal guns we can confiscate, THIS is the debate that should be occurring in the halls of Congress.

[HiTech RedNeck]

...and, Ms. Palin... SHARE THE GOSPEL!!

[neverdem]

BTTT!

[jonrick46]

From Dan Quayle's "Murphy Brown" Speech (19 MAY 1992):

I know it’s not fashionable to talk about moral values, but we need to do it. Even though our cultural leaders in Hollywood, network TV, and the national newspapers routinely jeer at them, I think most of us in this room know that some things are good and other things are wrong. And now, it’s time to make the discussion public.

It’s time to talk again about the family, hard work, integrity, and personal responsibility. We cannot be embarrassed out of our belief that two parents married to each other are better in most cases for children than one. That honest work is better than handouts or crime. That we are our brothers’ keepers. That it’s worth making an effort, even when the rewards aren’t immediate. So, I think the time has come to renew our public commitment to our Judeo-Christian values in our churches and synagogues, our civic organizations, and our schools. We are, as our children recite each morning, one nation under God. That’s a useful framework for acknowledging a duty and an authority higher than our own pleasures and personal ambition.

If we live more thoroughly by these values, we would live in a better society. [applause] For the poor, renewing these values will give the people the strength to help themselves by acquiring the tools to achieve self-sufficiency, a good education, job training, and property. Then they will move from permanent dependence to dignified independence.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Since the current federal administration ignores the law anyway, what difference does it make?