Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/20/2013 4:25:17 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rickmichaels

Nothing new here. No new evidence...just people finally looking over the obvious and realizing that the story by the parents doesn’t work too well.

If the cops had removed the family from the house as they arrived...the story would have fallen apart within twenty-four hours. Cops were not wise enough to grasp that.


2 posted on 09/20/2013 4:32:24 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Nothing new here. No new evidence...just people finally looking over the obvious and realizing that the story by the parents doesn’t work too well.

If the cops had removed the family from the house as they arrived...the story would have fallen apart within twenty-four hours. Cops were not wise enough to grasp that.


3 posted on 09/20/2013 4:32:25 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
I remember that case and was baffled then (as now ... I wish I hadn't been reminded .. ) as to why NOTHING ... absolutely nothing came out of any investigation.

A dead kid in my basement and NO ONE is charged ?

Child pageants should be outlawed.

I think it was because of this case that the word "prostitot" was coined.

4 posted on 09/20/2013 4:35:00 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

“DNA tests proved he was not at the scene.”

Sorry. DNA evidence cannot prove that anyone was not anywhere; it can show increased liklihood that someone was one place or another, but even then it should be accepted as in inference and not proof.

They could be there and leave no material, or they could be there and their material was not discovered. But it can’t show that they weren’t there.


5 posted on 09/20/2013 4:43:56 AM PDT by Coffee... Black... No Sugar (I'm gonna' BICKER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
My position on this from the start has been that Jon-Benet died accidentally, perhaps from horsing around with her brother, and the parents panicked and tried to make her death look like an intruder had killed her. But with Patsy now deceased, it's a cold case that will likely never be solved.
7 posted on 09/20/2013 4:48:23 AM PDT by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

I still think the brother did it and the parents covered up for their son.


9 posted on 09/20/2013 5:01:23 AM PDT by stilloftyhenight (TEA baby! Let's roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels
I'll never forget the “THILAND” thread some years ago. I was the second person to post the word, in that thread.
10 posted on 09/20/2013 5:05:20 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

Oh it was solved ok. They just never arrested the female perp...........


16 posted on 09/20/2013 7:06:05 AM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rickmichaels

The father was probably molesting the child..Patsy found out about it and took out her rage on her. Most likely accidentally killing her.


17 posted on 09/20/2013 7:47:26 AM PDT by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson