To: butterdezillion
So is this saying that private employers have to give the same benefits to same-sex spouses as to genuine husbands and wives?
Yup, that's exactly how I read it. At first I thought it was just for DoL employees, but it looks like it's a nationwide edict applying to ALL employers.
To: tanknetter
I have a feeling companies are going to drop their 401k plans.
I’m glad I’m at an age that none of this crap is really going to affect me. And I don’t give a damn about the following generations of liberals. I do feel for those who are against this kind of thing and worry about their grandkids.
35 posted on
09/19/2013 8:31:54 PM PDT by
VerySadAmerican
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
To: tanknetter; butterdezillion
So is this saying that private employers have to give the same benefits to same-sex spouses as to genuine husbands and wives? Yup, that's exactly how I read it. At first I thought it was just for DoL employees, but it looks like it's a nationwide edict applying to ALL employers.
I'm guessing that if they force employers to do this, then government should force them to cover "live-in"partners...those not legally married but have lived together for over 5 years or so. Same difference, IMO.
39 posted on
09/20/2013 3:49:52 AM PDT by
beachn4fun
(Guns are not the problem. People are. Forget the magazine...check your attitude.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson