[SoConPubbie]

Palin also does not support mass deportations and never has.

And yet that does not equate to Rand Paul's Amnesty Plan now does it?

Primarily because Governor Palin has stated very publically that the complete fence needs to be built and has never come out against E-Verify. Whereas Rand Paul has stated unequivocally that he is against the use of E-Verify as a solution and nowhere has stated he wants a Fence, but is instead relying on the false, lying "Secure Border" certification by a congress that is comprised of 50% Open-Border Democrats and 25% Open-Border Republicans.

What is it with Rand Paul supporters that they try to wrap themselves in an Apple/Oranges comparison of Rand Paul and Governor Palin instead of admitting that their guy from a conservative perspective, is completely wrong on this issue?

Or are you really a big 'L' Libertarian and are just hunky-dory with Open Borders?

This is where the rubber

[GeronL]

Cut off the bennies and they will leave on their own accord

[SoConPubbie]

This is where the rubber

That should have been:

This is where the rubber meets the road.

[jpsb]

"nowhere has stated he wants a Fence

Why do you continue to lie, lie, lie about Paul's positions?

"The Senate on Wednesday voted 61–37 to table an amendment to the immigration-reform bill that would have significantly strengthened the bill’s border-security and enforcement requirements. The so-called Trust but Verify amendment, offered by Senator Rand Paul (R., Ky.), would have given Congress, and not the Department of Homeland Security, the ultimate authority to determine if the border is effectively secure. It also included enhanced security measures, such as requiring a double-layer fence to be completed within five years, as well as a number of other triggers that must be implemented before illegal immigrants could be awarded legal status. “We desperately need immigration reform—but part of fixing the system is fixing our broken borders,” Paul said before the vote.