I am too stupid to get what they are talking about
No you're not. It's likely just more pseudo-"science"; politics masquerading as medicine. I believe very little of what today's "scientific" institutes put out anymore.
Most nonsense sounds like gobbldy gook.
They are saying this is why Rosie O’Donnell has hair all the way down her back and chest.
No you aren't. It's just a little obscure. The idea is that something in the Y chromosome doesn't turn an embryo into a male until well into the development of the embryo, and in this rare case it doesn't get switched on at all and you have what is morphologically a female - breasts, female hormones, etc - actually carry the chromosomes for a male. She's sterile as a result. But she has, in the single X chromosome she got from her mother, enough genetic information to form a nearly complete female.
Fascinating stuff. It is exquisitely uncomfortable for the supporters of abortion to contemplate just how much a fetus does develop in how little time. Undifferentiated tissue it is most certainly not.
Somewhere on that Y chromosome is the explanation for why only males attempt to light farts with fireworks. I would hate for future generations to be denied that important step in the evolution of our species.
>>>I am too stupid to get what they are talking about>>>
LOLZ! I’m so glad I’m not the only one.
I think stuff in OP is fact-laced conjecture, aka scientific-sounding sophistry, intended to blur distinctions between male and female.
Leftist feminazi prof promoting a path to another false science of consensus that being gay is a genetically programmed behavior. Born that way... can’t be cured... you know... the new agenda.
I grew up on a farm. Whatever happened to just lifting the tail up and giving it a gander?
Laying the groundwork to support the notion that homos are an important part of human society.
The article moves from actual science to PC propaganda. Weiss is studying how an embryo becomes male or female — a biological process complicated enough that it can go wrong sometimes. This is biology, based on experiment and observation. Billthedrill explained the basics. Baron-Cohen is studying autism and sex differences — how the biology translates into behavior. Still science, but complicated science because it involves human behavior. Then Susan Case from the School of Management brings in the party line. To confirm your stereotypes about her, check her web page http://weatherhead.case.edu/faculty/Susan-Case/
Nope. they are talking something simple most deer hunters know but gussying it up with too many fancy words. The more food and space there is the more bucks will be born. The less the food and the denser the population the more does will be born.
Men are more likely than women to have birth defects (like color blindness) because they are missing some genes on the missing part of the Y. Females have double insurance against color blindness. So it makes sense that the more stressful the environment for the mother the more likely things are to go wrong for the male.
then of course they had to add in the pc dribble