Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/16/2013 11:17:46 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: xzins

why should he negotiate? he doesn’t care about the debt ceiling... and hasn’t since he fedgov stopped updating our national debt on may 17th... about $50billion short of the ‘ceiling’

here’s a tip for those clueless republicrats...

a ‘ceiling’ is only a ceiling ... if you cannot exceed it, cannot ignore it, and cannot avoid it.

next time, put some teeth in the bill to insure its implemented


30 posted on 09/16/2013 11:46:02 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Obama has a CONSTITUTIONAL right to overspend!

And he would know - ‘cause he’s a Constitutional scholar, they say.


31 posted on 09/16/2013 11:46:26 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

"There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not,
if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh -
get first all the people's money, then their lands,
and then make them and their children servants forever.

It will be said that we do not propose to establish kings.
I know it.
But there is a natural inclination in mankind to kingly government.
It sometimes relieves them from aristocratic domination.
They had rather have one tyrant than 500.
It gives more the appearance of equality among citizens, and that they like.
I am apprehensive - therefore - perhaps too apprehensive -
that the government of these States may in future times end in a monarchy
[not called a monarchy but an executive with monarchial powers].
But this catastrophe, I think, may long be delayed,
if in our proposed system we do not sow the seeds of contention,
faction and tumult, by making our posts of honor places of profit.
If we do, I fear that, though we employ at first a number
and not a single person,
the number will in time be set aside,
it will only nourish the fetus of a king
(as the honorable gentleman from Virginia very aptly expressed it),
and a king will the sooner be set over us."

-- Benjamin Franklin

35 posted on 09/16/2013 11:57:38 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

What Obama is saying is that he will spend anything he likes and the Congress can go screw them selves.


42 posted on 09/16/2013 12:29:11 PM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
“What I haven’t been willing to negotiate, and I will not negotiate, is on the debt ceiling,” Obama told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos in an interview on “This Week.”

WE need to grab this gift from the President and run over him with it.

This is not about Republicans....

This is about the Dictator Obama.

43 posted on 09/16/2013 12:31:15 PM PDT by EBH (America is not judge, jury, and executioner for the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Is this the same guy who arbitrarily changed a section of a duly enacted law ( the ACA) without any reference to Congress (the Employer Mandate)? I believe this sort of behavior is referred to by those of the Hebrew persuasion as Chutzpah.


45 posted on 09/16/2013 12:35:24 PM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

He knows the Constitution?!?


47 posted on 09/16/2013 12:44:40 PM PDT by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

“...that changes the constitutional structure of this government entirely,”

____________________________________

How in the world did this guy even pass a Constitutional law class?


48 posted on 09/16/2013 12:55:42 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

All Right! Obama is drawing another red line in the sand! So we conservatives have WON!!


50 posted on 09/16/2013 1:02:52 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Somebody needs to tell the constitutional scholar that the president shouldn’t be negotiating anything. He can either sign or reject a bill.

But the senate has been acting as his shield. So nothing he doesn’t want will get to him so they can blame the republican House.

It’s getting old, though.


51 posted on 09/16/2013 1:10:33 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

But as senator Obama voted NO to increase the debt ceiling.

Come on Boehner & co take on Obama on his hypocrisy!


53 posted on 09/16/2013 1:41:04 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Boner should say “What I haven’t been willing to negotiate, and I will not negotiate, is on the debt ceiling so I’m glad we agree.”


56 posted on 09/16/2013 2:41:54 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

What Obama actually KNOWS AND FOLLOWS regarding the Constitution could fit on the head of a pin.


57 posted on 09/16/2013 3:39:58 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson