Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Backs Off From Syria Filibuster Threat
Newsmax ^ | Sunday, 08 Sep 2013 11:21 AM | By Audrey Hudson

Posted on 09/08/2013 12:55:47 PM PDT by JSDude1

Sen. Rand Paul said Sunday he would not filibuster the president's request to launch strikes against Syria but that he would insist Barack Obama abide by Congress's demands if it votes to prohibit military intervention in the civil war.

The Kentucky Republican told "Fox News Sunday" a filibuster would only delay a vote authorizing use of force.

"I will insist there is full debate on this and I will insist that I get an amendment and my amendment will say that the vote is binding -- that the president cannot, if we vote him down, decide to go to war anyway," Paul said.

"That's the way I interpret the Constitution, and I will insist on at least one vote where we say, 'Hey guys, this is not political show, this is not constitutional theater, this is a binding vote,'" Paul said.

Asked if he would support impeaching Obama if he disregarded the will of Congress, Paul cited several examples in which he believed the president had already done so

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rand-paul-syria-filibuster/2013/09/08/id/524416#ixzz2eKhLO2Da Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Russia; Syria; US: Kentucky; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911truther; 911truthers; antiwar; antiwardotcom; filibuster; iran; israel; kentucky; lebanon; lewrockwelldotcom; libertarians; maheralassad; paul; potassiumfluoride; randpaul; randpaultruthfile; randsconcerntrolls; ronpaultruthfile; russia; sarin; senate; sodiumfluoride; syria; thebrotherdidit; unitedkingdom; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
I think we write/call Mr. Paul and ASK HIM TO FILIBUSTER the Syrian War proposal. If we are serious about stopping WWIII (and with Russia, China sending warships..well have you read the Revelations lately)?
1 posted on 09/08/2013 12:55:47 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

http://www.paul.senate.gov/?p=contact


2 posted on 09/08/2013 12:55:56 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Is John Boehner the Neville Chamberlain of American Politics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Rand Paul= all BLOW No SHOW! Typical “Libertarian” WUSS!


3 posted on 09/08/2013 12:59:24 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Fix is in


4 posted on 09/08/2013 1:01:06 PM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Was he bluster when he spoke against John Brennan?

IMO, Mr. Paul is more Reagan conservative (with libertarian leanings than his dad)!


5 posted on 09/08/2013 1:01:33 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Is John Boehner the Neville Chamberlain of American Politics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Something that is truly admirable is a man that won’t stand on principle.

He is GOP, that is all.


6 posted on 09/08/2013 1:03:20 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

“Rand Paul= all BLOW No SHOW! Typical “Libertarian” WUSS!”

That is one way of looking at it. But clearly BHO is trying to find a way of blaming congress whether he goes ahead with military options or not.

By having a vote, whatever the outcome, I think RP is trying to put the problem back on BHO. BHO shot off his mouth and according to some accounts orchestrated this mess, he needs to own it.


7 posted on 09/08/2013 1:04:27 PM PDT by Max_850
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

YES he was, he should have prepared himself better for a REAL Filibuster(Catheter, Water Bottles) etc.


8 posted on 09/08/2013 1:04:33 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All; JSDude1; mickie
He may know the vote is already in the tank against Obama. Why knock him without knowing his other reasons which he may not want to mention right now? He's about one of five or ten in the hundreds of house members who shows any guts whenever the rubber meets the road.

Leni

9 posted on 09/08/2013 1:06:20 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
When the music starts, the Congressional Saudi Harem will dance.


10 posted on 09/08/2013 1:06:34 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I don’t think they have the votes in the Senate for final passage. Several Democrats could lose their jobs over this.


11 posted on 09/08/2013 1:08:54 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I see no Dr Ron Paul on the horizon; the cavalry ain’t coming; this is an inside jog, or not at all !!!!!!
Semper watching !!!!!!
*****


12 posted on 09/08/2013 1:11:00 PM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

And what was your price, Senator?


13 posted on 09/08/2013 1:11:23 PM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (I'm clinging to my God and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I hadn’t heard him say he would filibuster. I’ve heard lots of questions about whether he would followed by the inevitable claim that he had backed down.

Plenty of stupid people on the right buy into this crap.


14 posted on 09/08/2013 1:11:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Dr Ron Paul, OH WHAT A JOKE HE IS!


15 posted on 09/08/2013 1:15:50 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We always destroy our own.


16 posted on 09/08/2013 1:16:55 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

When he did use the filibuster the same bunch dogpiled on him calling it “stupid,” “useless,” “a dog and pony show” etc. It doesn’t matter that he has been out front fighting against an action in Syria tooth and nail they’ll slam him anyway.


17 posted on 09/08/2013 1:19:20 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dforest

There would have been no point in a filibuster. Filibusters are to delay votes.


18 posted on 09/08/2013 1:20:26 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

OK, real question: is Rand Paul being dumb like a fox & allowing Syria intervention to come to a vote in the full Senate so that the Dems will own (and be owned)
.yue eeeeeee899999999999by my cat just walked over the keyboard by the outcome?

In other words, if the Dems are driving off a cliff then by all means get out of their way?

Wait - if Dingy Harry Reid doesn’t want to allow a potentially embarrassing-to-Obama vote to come up, he’ll block it seven ways to Sunday. There’s that to consider.


19 posted on 09/08/2013 1:26:04 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

A filibuster prevents a vote.

Currently in Congress, if making war against Syria was voted on, it most likely wouldn’t pass.

If it does not pass, and there is a binding agreement that Obama cannot act unilaterally, then the American people win.

If the vote is delayed, then Obama has more time to bribe or blackmail congressmen into submission.

Do you think a delay in the vote will really help stop this administration from acting extra-constitutionally?

A binding agreement would definitely impact the executive branch.


20 posted on 09/08/2013 1:26:08 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson