Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The video judges tried to block: Father secretly records harrowing moment six-hour-old baby is
http://www.dailymail.co.uk ^ | september 5, 2013 | Steve Doughty

Posted on 09/06/2013 3:29:55 PM PDT by lowbridge

This is the moment social services took a baby away from its parents when it was just six hours old.

The infant at the centre of the Munby judgment, known only as J, was removed from its parents after his birth in April.

The father secretly filmed the seizure on a webcam attached to the family computer.

It has long been available on the internet but an edited version can only now be published and viewed legitimately.

The views of the father and mother of the four children taken into care by Staffordshire social workers can also now be published following yesterday's landmark judgment by President of the Family Division Sir James Munby.

In June the baby's father was given a suspended six-week prison sentence by a family court judge for his refusal to co-operate in getting the video removed from internet sites.

The parents said social workers removed their baby because they decided their mother was incapable of bringing them up because of her learning disability.

The video shows the father holding the newborn infant at their home when social workers and police come to take it away.

In the video, the mother is clearly distraught and holds onto her baby and rocks it as her husband remonstrates with officers and council staff.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: greatbritain; sourcetitlenoturl; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Shimmer1

And if I made a sneering comment about America’s greatness, I’d be a Eurotrash/pompous Limey anti-American.


21 posted on 09/07/2013 4:46:07 AM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

So true.


22 posted on 09/07/2013 5:53:17 AM PDT by gfbtbb (Ladies and Gentlemen, we are on our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

well....Yeah!

lol!


23 posted on 09/07/2013 6:09:38 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Every time a liberal gets pissed off an angel gets their wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; lowbridge; yldstrk

// ‘My wife has a learning disability and for a period I was depressed, although that was quickly over after the GP helped. But the social worker tried to section me. The court was told that there was a risk the children would come to harm in the future.

‘They were never harmed. They were taken away as a preventative or precautionary measure.’ // (snip from midway through the article)


Key concept: “...and for a period I was depressed, although that was quickly over after the GP helped.”

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS when what should be personal medical matters are entangled in government oversight.

THIS IS WHAT obamacare will bring here. And it won’t be just children they try to take.


24 posted on 09/07/2013 9:56:43 AM PDT by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cyn

100% right


25 posted on 09/07/2013 10:39:42 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson