Posted on 09/06/2013 12:23:29 PM PDT by Zakeet
Barack Obama is, without question, the most embarrassing president of my lifetime — and that is saying something, since my life so far has encompassed 12 presidencies, some of which have brought a lot of embarrassment to the nation. Even Richard Nixon, with his Watergate scandal, Jimmy Carter, with his malaise, and Bill Clinton, with his lewd behavior in the Oval Office, could not top this president for pure, unadulterated disgrace.
Of course, in Obama’s case, it is not a matter of personal scandal like it was for Clinton. By telling the world a year ago that he was drawing a red line in the hot desert sands of Syria — that red line being the use of chemical weapons — he created the debacle that currently threatens to engulf the Middle East. He blustered at the time that if the regime of Bashar al-Assad crossed that red line, there will be a price to pay. No one yet knows what that price will be, but from the current discussion, it appears that it will involve the destruction of at least three camels, four sheep, a half-dozen goats and an abandoned aspirin factory. That oughta show ‘em!
[Snip]
Obama is a symbol of much of today’s generation, which accepts no responsibility for anything. Therefore, when something goes wrong among his cockamamie plans, it must be someone else’s fault. Usually, of course, it would be George Bush’s fault, but even Obama couldn’t bring himself to tell that one again, not in this case. No, this time it’s the whole world’s fault. And Congress. And America. It’s American credibility that will suffer, he told the world, not his. Unbelievable.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
That's the problem. How do you define the "end?"
The man is a dolt that was pushed by the media and his supporters. All of his records are hidden because there fraudulent or there just isnt any because he has not accomplished a thing in his sorry a## life.
Il Douche.
"The 'end'" is your military objective; when you achieve that objective, then you know when the 'end' has come. The Revolutionary War came to an end when the British ceased their aggressions and pulled back, leaving the Colonists to themselves. The Civil War came to an end when everyone decided they had had enough of the killing and settled the underlying questions. World War II ended when the various Axis factions decided they were not going to achieve their objectives.
Part of the problem with the Korean and Vietnam "wars" was there was no clear objective. Indeed, at least one if not both of those bruhahas were characterized as "police actions", not "war", so we as a country found ourselves ensnared in a tar baby with no way out.
He’s an angry two year old and a THUG.
Our military objective is for Muslim terrorists to quit attacking us, or trying to.
One effective way to accomplish this would be to kill every Muslim in the world. No Muslims, no Muslim terrorists. Obviously, we aren’t going to do that, not because we aren’t capable of doing so, but because we are unwilling (Thank God!) to be the type of people who would do such a thing.
Short of that, it becomes really difficult to figure out a strategy that will achieve the objective, at least using methods we’re willing to use. In fact, I don’t think there is any such strategy.
Since the objective cannot be accomplished, we default to trying to minimize attacks on us. When you can’t win, you try to reduce the damage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.