Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian gov’t faces carbon tax backlash at poll
Associated Press ^ | Sep 6, 2013 9:57 AM EDT | Kristen Gelineau and Rod McGuirk

Posted on 09/06/2013 8:21:46 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The ruling Labor Party’s probable collapse in Australia’s next election is largely the consequence of its qualified success in the last one three years ago. To form the coalition she needed to stay in power, then-Prime Minister Julia Gillard reneged on a promise and agreed to place a carbon tax on major polluters.

On Saturday, the bill for that bargain comes due. Voters have never stopped hating the tax and its effect on their electric bills. Longtime Labor Party supporters—even people who have helped cut pollution by installing solar panels at home—have flocked to the opposition. …

Opposition leader Tony Abbott has declared the election a “referendum on the carbon tax”—a sure sign of confidence that most voters remain staunchly against it, with many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backlash; carbontax; climatechangehoax; globalwarminghoax; juliagillard; laborparty; tonyabbott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2013 8:21:46 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
companies forced to pay the tax are just passing it on to the customers.

How stupid are those Australians? It would be like voting for Obama when he said power costs would necessarily rise.

2 posted on 09/06/2013 8:26:00 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw5Lda06iK0?&rel=0&autoplay=1&vq=hd720&width=640&height=480


3 posted on 09/06/2013 8:32:37 AM PDT by A. Morgan (Ayn Rand: "You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“with many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers”

Companies either pass on the cost of doing business to customers, or they go out of business. That simple fact eludes liberals who believe there are no consequences for anything.


4 posted on 09/06/2013 8:37:12 AM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"...many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers..."

And what, exactly, did they SUPPOSE was going to happen...?

5 posted on 09/06/2013 8:39:23 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The carbon tax was and is a phony tax, based on a totally erroneous emphasis on carbon dioxide as a pollutant, which is a fiction unsupported by science or practical experience.

The only objective was to create an artificial scarcity of energy. The so-called “green” and “renewable” energy sources are unreliable, insufficient and exorbitantly expensive, in comparison with just about ANY other energy source.


6 posted on 09/06/2013 8:42:33 AM PDT by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“with many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers.”

Ya think? …


7 posted on 09/06/2013 8:43:48 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan; TheOldLady; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952
**snickering**
Got a "live" here...
an Al Gore "Glo-BULL" Warmist.

8 posted on 09/06/2013 8:48:30 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan; TheOldLady; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952
"live" = "live one" since 1998.

9 posted on 09/06/2013 8:50:35 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The Australian Galileo Movement has some great information debunking not only the carbon tax, but also the whole notion of man caused global warming. Link to their website
10 posted on 09/06/2013 9:10:29 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Ummmmm......did you watch the video?


11 posted on 09/06/2013 9:11:35 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

They picked the right name indeed. Real science versus the behemoth of state doctrine.


12 posted on 09/06/2013 9:24:16 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; A. Morgan; TheOldLady; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952
did you watch the video?
yes, I did.... :(well, the first min)...
I stand corrected; it's a great / outstanding U-tube video.

(it really destroys/explodes the Global-warming Mythes..by technical means/not psycho-babble)
My apologies to A. Morgan; TheOldLady; darkwing104; Arrowhead1952.

13 posted on 09/06/2013 9:41:04 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stevenc131

“with many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers”

Wow! The nerve!


14 posted on 09/06/2013 10:16:12 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stevenc131

And, of course, the real outrage is that their country has been doing a brisk business recently exporting shiploads of dirty, nasty coal...so that the Chinese have the energy to make Cool Geek Stuff for liberals to buy and to play with.


15 posted on 09/06/2013 10:18:53 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stevenc131

They charge a tax that makes the price for the customer go up. The the gov. gives the customer compensation for the price increase.

What is accomplished by this money shuffle?

Somebody is putting money in their pocket. Who?


16 posted on 09/06/2013 10:24:02 AM PDT by glyptol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
How stupid are those Australians?

I believe it only took one shooting to get Aussies to give up their firearms to the govt.

17 posted on 09/06/2013 11:08:35 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

yep


18 posted on 09/06/2013 11:10:29 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
with many believing that companies forced to pay the tax are simply passing the cost onto consumers

Well duh.... where do you think companies get their money to pay their taxes??

19 posted on 09/06/2013 11:11:32 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz
I believe it only took one shooting to get Aussies to give up their firearms to the govt.

Untrue. Australians retain the legal right to own firearms and millions of guns are in private hands in Australia. The effect of the post-Port Arthur gun laws has been seriously misrepresented and exaggerated in the United States. They are nowhere near being good laws, but they are also nowhere near as bad as they are made out to be.

And they didn't come in after one shooting, but after a spate of single gunman spree killings over the course of more than a decade - The Port Arthur massacre of 1996 (35 killed) came after the Hoddle Street (7 killed) and Queen Street (8 killed) mass killings in Melbourne in 1987, the Kimberley massacre (5 killed) of 1987, the Surry Hills (5 killing (5 killed) in 1990, the Strathfield Massacre (7 killed) of 1991, and the Central Coast Massacre (6 killed) of 1992. We had an epidemic of this style of mass murder in the late 1980s and early 1990s - Port Arthur was just the last and the worst. There hasn't been one since.

20 posted on 09/06/2013 3:09:38 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson