Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Guilt, Public Education, My Clear Conscience
Townhall.com ^ | September 1, 2013 | James Allen

Posted on 09/01/2013 8:36:06 AM PDT by Kaslin

A new cornerstone piece on public education by Allison Benedikton on Slate.com titled, "If You Send Your Kid to Private School, You Are a Bad Person," was shocking but consistent and clearly revealed that liberals value the word “education,” as long as the word “public,” precedes it. According to the author, public schools continue to fail because parents are sending their children to private schools, instead of public schools. Parents who spend their hard earned money to send their children to private schools are in fact destroying the fabric of America’s public education: which is immoral. For liberals, abortion is not a moral issue but rather an issue of liberty and choice. Education whether public, private or charter, should have the same application of liberty and personal choice. Unfortunately, allowing freedom and choice in education would require an admission of failure and for liberals to turn their back on a core government institution.

This is because liberals value community more than the first and primary institution, which is “The Family.” Liberals believe that public education equals strong community and that all people have an obligation to community before family. Since community is more important than family, we are therefore obligated to send our children to public schools that are failing. Liberals would also suggest that we invest our time and other resources to improve the failing schools, as if other options did not exist. Truthfully, I feel no such obligation to public education nor can I intellectually rationalize sentencing my child to state education for the sake of the greater good. Public schools need good students and good parents and I understand that, but not at the cost of my child’s future.

So in applying this blind allegiance, if I live near a failing public school –which many people do – I have an obligation to send my children to that school. I also by implication of this argument have an obligation to fight for what my child needs as in new computers, AP classes, and specialized education. Liberals believe that property taxes are not enough, even for parents who pay for public education and do not use it and also pay for private education. Liberals want more than our money they want our flesh and blood and for us to sacrifice our children on the public school alter no matter the cost. Instead, I would rather send my child to a school where I believe they will be educated, instead of learning how to be busy worker bees producing widgets. It is my belief that classes in formal logic, centered in a classical education, will provide my child with an ancient forgotten skill: the ability to think and reason properly.

In my opinion, public education is as bad as public restrooms or public swimming pools. People become accustomed to free stuff and then develop a sense of entitlement believing they deserve community pools and free lunches. Feeling that we have certain natural rights and actually having them are two completely different things. I feel I have a natural right to dunk a basketball and play in the NBA, but no matter how hard I practice, playing in the NBA is not possible because I am a 170-pound short white guy. The government does not give rights to people and our constitution only protects our natural rights from the threat of government. Liberals and progressives in the Democratic Party have an agenda that is connected to a misguided worldview and it starts in public education.

Liberals value equality and so do conservatives, but the definition of that word is used very differently between conservatives and liberals. I believe human beings have natural rights by the very nature of being human, whereas liberals believe their rights come from government. Conservatives believe in equality of opportunity, as all men and women being equal before God. Liberals on the other hand believe in equality of outcomes, where everyone becomes so equal that no one really has anything at all.

Applying the equality of outcomes to education is not only foolish but also dangerous. I will send my child to a school where their talent will be cultivated and they will learn how to think. In short, any school that is in line with my values is where I want my child to attend.

Leave the public schools to liberals and to people who do not care and wish to die on the hill of public education reform. The longer we suffer the fools of government the longer they can pretend their grand ideas are working. I do believe in community and in the importance of education. What we are missing is not the want or desire for community and better education, but an actual foundation for community to exist.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: liberalidealogy; privateschools; publiceducation; schoolchoice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Silentgypsy

We already knew you were a surly curmudgeon, but we love you anyway.


21 posted on 09/01/2013 12:08:54 PM PDT by Tax-chick (One drink away from telling everyone what I really think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell; Standing Wolf

I believe there is a reason he used when, instead of if. When sounds more positive then if


22 posted on 09/01/2013 12:47:10 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Don’t just acknowledge your liberal guilt—listen to it.

ROFLMAOPIMPWTIME!!!


23 posted on 09/01/2013 12:56:22 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell
When we restore our lost constitutional republic,
Wouldn't "If" be more accurate?

I chose "when" because I believe it's inevitable the post-constitutional so-called "progressive" oligarchy will collapse. President You Didn't Build That and the uppermost layer of decision-makers in the feral bureaucracy are looters, rapists, armed robbers, extortionists, and the like, not innovators or inventors or creators or builders or managers. They're skillful destroyers, all right, if only because they're haters through and through, but they can't build or manage. I can't say how soon their scheme will collapse, nor how much ancillary damage will be done, but here's what we've seen with every Marxist regime that's come to power: failure, more failure, and more and more failure.

That's not all; in fact, that may be only the smaller half. Off the top of my head, I'd guess about a quarter of all the people in America today are looters. More than that are feral government dependents, but many of those are just taking what's offered. Half or more of us aren't looters of any kind, stripe, or description. We're builders, innovators, creators, ordinary people who've always been independent, upright citizens, and don't want anything to do with the oligarchy and its plans for us. Some people are state serf material, all right, but half and probably more than half of us are sensible, ordinary, old-fashioned Americans. Nobody's ever going to reduce us to serfdom. We've put up with being told how much ethanol needs to be in our gasoline, how many gallons of water we can use to flush our toilets, how much we've got to pay in extra taxes, what kind of so-called "nation building" we've got to do all over the Middle East, but sooner or later, the oligarchy will go an extra-last step too far.

One state or another will secede first, and in short order, one or two or eleven or twelve will follow suit. I don't doubt the "progressive" oligarchs would be delighted to fight a second Civil War and kill millions—mass murder is the ultimate measure of all Marxist dictators, after all—but who's actually going to fly the aircraft and drop the bombs and cross the rivers and close down the highways?

If New York City people and New Jerseyans and Californians want to try to keep the oligarchy afloat, so be it, but most of us aren't going to have a choice other than to restore our lost Constitution, stamp out the "progressive" idiocy, and rebuild the America we've always loved, but lost one regulation and one rule and one ruling at a time.

24 posted on 09/01/2013 3:29:39 PM PDT by Standing Wolf (No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Thank you for the thoughtful post.

I hope you realize that some here will read it as follows: “I hate my children and despise the Constitution. I am a communist, child-abusing Obama sycophant.”


25 posted on 09/01/2013 3:37:19 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
Yes, there is plenty of that. So be it...

Something we can all agree on. The failure of the education system is in part due to uninvolved parents. This is very clear in inner cities. And throwing billions at the school system will not solve the problem.

26 posted on 09/01/2013 4:40:08 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf

Well said.

I, too, prefer “when.” I am an eternal optimist.

I believe the main reason we have slid so far and have not yet pushed back is because those of us who are the innovators or inventors or creators or builders or managers are incredibly busy innovating, inventing, creating, building, and managing. In addition we are busy raising children, taking care of parents, helping our friends, neighbors, churches, and schools.

The deadbeats have time on their hands to lobby and march for more “freebies.” We do not. But we have shown on several occasions (tea party rallies, etc.) that we can only be pushed so far. We’re getting pretty close to the last straw. The pushback is going to shock the progressives, the looters, and the deadbeats.


27 posted on 09/08/2013 6:19:19 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy
How bizarre. They abort their children so that they don’t have to be bothered with them, and then they want to interfere with others’ children’s upbringing.

Good point.

28 posted on 09/08/2013 6:23:15 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson