Argue it all you wish. But if he runs, this site will support him to the hilt. Those who get nasty about it and or attack us or our good patriotic conservative friends like Mark Levin or our very best grassroots conservative candidates may find they no longer have accounts here.
THANK YOU and AMEN!! Our Constitution has been ignored
and subverted in many ways lately. It would be wonderful if
it was followed to the ‘T’, but it hasn’t been for a while
now. The rules have changed and the hour is late. I do not
want another conservative to slip through our fingers.
Fight like a GGRRRRLL! and fight dirty, if need be.
If Ted Cruz is in, I’m in. Thanks to Sarah Palin and Mark
Levin for backing and promoting him, too.
All that having been said, is it possible for FR to meaningfully participate by organizing for Ted Cruz? There are other candidates (always) who I could support but I would just as soon get the primary contest over as soon as possible to avoid the 2012 disaster of having all too many good candidates to dilute the vote and allow Mittler to be nominated.
This time, Job #1 is destroying the GOP-E $$$ stranglehold on nominations. Let's send them and their well-funded lies packing. Let us encourage militant conservative populism as our standard for 2016. For POTUS. For Senate. For Congress. For governorships. For state legislators.
God bless you and FR. Thanks for being you.
Hmmm., I’ve heard a lot of the “My way or the Highway” mantra lately....
Is not this site funded by donations?
Dialog, even when unpleasant, is valuable and should be encouraged, not stifled (I agree ad homenim attacks notwithstanding).
I personally believe NBC is more than what a corrupted SCOTUS, or a federal law states. NBC means just that, not derived from some act of will or act of law based on a flawed interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
Ted Cruz, in my opinion, like Mitt Romney and Obama, does not meet the NBC criteria of being born to two parents, both citizens, natural or naturalized, at time of his birth, within the jurisdiction of the US.
Sorry, but the principle of Occam’s Razor applies.
If you dislike my opinion, based in the understood definition of international law of the day (of the Constitution)and decide to ban me for it, go ahead.
Be kind enough to send me a note though, otherwise you’ll be acting like “them”...
Both law and SCOTUS opinion are changeable, the wording of the US Constitution is not.
Anyway, I like Ted, too.
I just refuse compromise any longer, after all, it is only our republic at stake.
Regards;