I don’t know...he’s saying “the world” has to do something. Sounds like they’re weasling out of it now to me (not that that’s a bad thing.)
No, this is a leap in logic to an objective you predetermined that happens to fit the facts as you interpret them. There's no smoking gun with Assad's fingerprints on it.
Nothing gives a country more credibility than sneaking a few cruse missiles into a capital city.
This evidence coming from the NSA and CIA who know NOTHING about
Benghazi, but everything about Assad?
Plus Clapper from NSA got caught lying to Congress.
I don’t believe a word of it.
Excuse me? The question is not “what do we know” but “what are we going to do about it”? About what? Something we don’t know?
But then, all the Dems were told they’d have to vote for the Obamacare bill before they could know what was in it, so I guess this is cool with Dems - who unfortunately are the majority.
Bombing Syria without any support from any other country is about the dumbest thing they could do. So of course they’re going to do it.
It’s a DIVERSION from all the domestic scandals besetting this gang of criminals.
Hey, all you stupid low information voters. Don’t look there. Look at this shiny thing over HERE!
Its surreal. What could be next?
Why is evryone saying he made a case for attacking when Kerry said:
The president has been clear: Any action that he might decide to take will be limited and (sic) tailored response to ensure that, a despots brutal and flagrant use of chemical weapons is held accountable. And ultimately, ultimately we are committed — we remain committed, we believe it’s — the primary objective is (sic) to have a diplomatic process that can resolve this through negotiation, because we know there is no ultimate military solution.
It has to be political.
It has to happen at the negotiating table.
And we are deeply committed to getting there.
I was watching Kerry, a fly few on the screen, my firt thought was...Flies really are attracted to sh.it.
The U.S. is not going to bomb Syria.
The shadowy cabal of leftists who snuck Barry into office are going to.
Kerry’s own Gulf of Tonkin.
I believe that it will happen. It is just a matter of time until it happens. Obama is going to have to do something or Assad will beat his cohorts, the muslim brotherhood. What happens after that is anybody’s guess.
I would put Assad’s character up beside Kerry’s any day.
In the meantime, this awkward photo of Secretary of State John Kerry and his wife dining with the Assads in 2009 has gone viral amidst Kerry's harshest criticism of the Syrian government to date. Describing the government's use of chemical weapons against civilians as a "cowardly crime" and a "moral obscenity," Kerry said, "There must be accountability for those who would use the world's most heinous weapons against the world's most vulnerable people."
>>>As Kerry called Bashar al-Assad “a thug and a murderer,”<<<
Is it a new normal for a diplomat to call a foreign elected leader like that?
I'll bet he resigns for 'personal' reasons by the end of the year and Susan Rice takes over at State.