Just two days left in August.
Don't drag this FReepathon into September.
Let's put this baby to bed.
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
Takes more than he said, she said. We’ve got radio intercepts. That is called proof.
When we become OIL INDEPENDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once again it is the Saudis who are behind terror organization and financing. Never forget that sourcing of this info very well may be those “horrible” Israelis of the Mossad.
IMHO the rebellion against Assad doesn’t seem to going as well as the (terrorist) “err” rebels expected and some outside intervention is needed. What better way to draw the westerners into delivering some free airmail to their enemy than to stage a convenient atrocity. The Brits aren’t buying it but BHO seems to be taking the bait hook line and sinker.
The Saudis are a major player in the middle east. Like ‘em or not, we have to deal with them.
That said™, we've wasted more than enough American blood and money in Islamic terror states. Standing back isn't going to do non-Muslims in Syria a speck of good; conversely, neither we nor anyone else is going to do them any good. It's time and long past time for Islam to solve its own [fill in the blank] problems.
little wonder that the Brits backed out....I for one, totally fed up with the Muslim tribal wars....not one spark of blood should be shed, over a bunch of mongrels from the 5th century.....
Why are our Congressmen doing nothing to stop World War III initiated by a Kenyan from our country, based on lies?
The Saudis have been financing terror indoctrination mosques (that being, the most anti-American, anti-Christian variety) and military training camps for years, all around the world.
But our politicians are in on the take:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0409/White_House_No_bow_to_Saudi.html
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/saudi-arabia-s-terror-finance-problem_592744.html
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/08/16/news-corp-the-saudi-prince-and-the-ground-zero-mosque/
Remember well Obama’s bow to the Saudi king. . . .
I have my own theory about who used the chemical weapons and why.
First, a brief summary of what we know to date:
1. It makes no sense that the regime used chemical weapons to further any of its interests
” The Assad regime was not desperate. Over the past month or so the regime has launched a major offensive, reclaiming Homs back from rebel control, pressing forward towards Aleppo as well as having overrun other important positions held by rebel forces.” ...
“Now, until recently, Jordan has quietly and discreetly provided support for some of the rebel forces, particularly defectors from the Syrian Army which is good for the rebels and better than having jihadist, extreme Sunni sectarians or warlord types.
The speech was a surprise due to the level of uncertainty (rather than enthusiasm) it highlighted for the rebel cause. The King stressed that religious scholars –be they Sunni, or Shia, or Sufi or Salafi or Alawitte, I repeat “Alawitte,” must sit down together and do everything to end the sectarian motivated conflict with a negotiated settlement.
That speech must have made headlines throughout the Arab world or at the very least resonated in the chambers of al-Assad’s power. And yet, the next day the Sarin gas attack took place. Go figure”
2. However, the regime certainly acted guilty after the attack:
” If the Syrian Army did not launch this attack and it was the fault of the rebels, then why didn’t the Syrian regime allow, indeed encourage, the U.N. inspectors, staying in a hotel only an estimated 15 minute drive from the massacre, to go to the site last Wednesday instead of delaying permission? What’s more, immediately after the alleged chemical weapons attack took place, the Syrian Army launched an offensive and heavily shelled the area..”
Also, many have claimed that the rebels wouldn’t have had the means to launch such a large scale attack.
Hypothesis:
If you are an al Qaeda rebel with access to the internet, you would know that your best chance of becoming the new power in Syria would be to somehow get the government to use chemical weapons.
So your try to force a small unit that you know has the weapons into a no-win situation where they will use them, but you fail repeatedly.
Then, if you think overthrowing the regime and establishing Islamist rule is worth a few martyrs (sound familiar?) you go for plan B:
The next time a Syrian army officer offers to defect (and there have been plenty of army defections, see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Syrian_defectors), you say: stay right where you are because you have access to the chemical weapons. We need you to fire off a few rounds into a civilian area, and THEN defect. By doing so you will bring the same coalition that toppled Ghaddafi to topple Assad.
Now imagine you are the Syrian regime reacting to this scenario. You call the head of Syrian DoD and demand answers. Knowing his regime and his life are on the line he calls the local commander in a panic and demands answers:
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/08/27/exclusive_us_spies_say_intercepted_calls_prove_syrias_army_used_nerve_gas
“Last Wednesday, in the hours after a horrific chemical attack east of Damascus, an official at the Syrian Ministry of Defense exchanged panicked phone calls with a leader of a chemical weapons unit, demanding answers for a nerve agent strike that killed more than 1,000 people. Those conversations were overheard by U.S. intelligence services, The Cable has learned”
The situation on the ground is a mess, the defector (or defectors) has deliberately muddled your understanding of what actually happened there.
You don’t want the UN to find out that you were even keeping the last resort weapons, and you definitely don’t want them to discover what the rogue unit has done (because you know how the UN/NATO will react) so you close off the area until you can figure out what happened. A few days later, you still don’t really know what happened but your continued blockage of the inspectors is becoming the equivalent of a guilty plea, so you let them in.
The relationship the Saudis have cultivated with the U.S. - to control what the U.S. thinks of them - is one of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. To the Saudis, in Middle East geopolitical relations, the U.S. is the hired help.
Or course it would not be worth it to show it to the Obamadork.
1. If it has any technical terms in it, the dork will not understand.
2. If it days anything bad about muzzies, he’ll not believe it.
3. It would take him all day to read through the first page - if one did not use one or two syllable phrases normally chosen by “community organizers”.
No one trusts the slimeball...except dim-bulb-crats, the MSM, and the muslim brotherhood.
Just picked up a Trojan at Zero Hedge.
McAfee just sent an alert that it had been detected and isolated it.
t
“When will we deliver justice to the Saudis? “
And to the LIAR in chief?
This causes me to question the entire credibility of this article. Sarin is a gas. It is usually packed into small sphere that when ruptured, allows the liguid sarin to release gas. It is not stored as a gas as far as I know.
Obambo Don't Need No Steekin' Coalition !
This is what they refer to as an old-fashioned “set up.” Odumbo will fall for it- purposefully I fear.
The incredibly frank discussion between Saudi's spy-chief Prince Bandar and Russia's Putin exposed a much deeper plot is afoot and the following details from the actual people on the ground in the chemically-attacked region of Syria suggest Obama is playing right into the Saudi's plan.
What do you think about this?