Potty mouth? I am sorry that the correct medical term offends you. It is your narrow mind that applies the vulgarity to it. The only waste of bandwidth are pretend constitutional scholars making up definitions to attack a true conservative. Their hidden agenda is the only serious issue here, not Cruz’s eligibility.
You’re mocking a serious issue: WHY DO THE COURTS INSIST THAT IT IS NOT OUR BUSINESS WHETHER THE CHOICES WE HAVE TO VOTE FOR IN CRITICAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ARE EVEN CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE?
Are you saying that the courts can deliberately keep us ignorant of matters we NEED to know about, in order to uphold the Constitution in the voting booth? Are you agreeing with the courts that it’s none of your business, to know whether the person you’re considering voting for could be kicked out if he was elected?
Vaginal birth, epesiotomy stitches, duration of labor, etc - that’s all stuff that only matters to the NSA and the thugs Obama is giving access to our medical records, and only for bribery and tabloid purposes much like Obama used to get his opponent’s divorce records and sexual allegations unsealed in order to win an election. Those are not legal issues and you know it. You bring that up only to mock what IS a serious issue - what the Founding Fathers meant when they said that only a “natural born citizen” shall be eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.
I call you a potty mouth because you totally ignored what we both knew was the legal question and focused in on the process of giving birth which is irrelevant. I’ve given birth 6 times; I use the technical terminology regularly and have no embarrassment about it. When a radiologist focuses in on a breast for a mammogram there is nothing filthy about it. When somebody pretending to talk the law regarding cancer insurance focuses in on a breast when it is irrelevant to the legalities being discussed, it is a potty mouth thing to do.