“To: WildHighlander57
Indeed. There is a possibility 3; It happened exactly as the HDOH says it did.
163 posted on Mon Aug 26 2013 05:07:45 GMT-0500 (CDT) by Natufian (t) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
IF (and I say IF) #3 were the case, then
1) the (so-called) LFBC shown on the white house web site is OK ... WHICH IT IS NOT... See the forensic analysts report to Sheriff Arpaio’s posse.
2) the birth cert numbering is OK... WHICH IT IS NOT ... See butterdezillions research.
3) The HDOH is honest.... WHICH IT IS NOT.... again, see butterdezillions research.
The posse would not have taken their case to congress if there wasn’t a problem with the HDOH ...... AND OTHER DOCUMENTS.
The selective service app is bogus (date postmarked vs date signed, he wasn’t in Hawaii those dates)
0 is using a soc sec number that was issued to ANOTHER PERSON.
The soc sec number is for a guy that had it issued late in life and he passed away without collecting benefits.
It was issued at a time where the first three numbers denoted area in which the person lived/ submitted the form.
The first three numbers for 0 are for Connecticut, and 0 wasn’t there at that time- probably not born yet.
So we have a pattern here; “ once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and three times is enemy action”.
Butterdezillion, need links to your three analyses!
BC numbering problem: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/clue-2-obama-apparently-given-stig-waidelichs-bc/ More on it at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/the-hdoh-has-juggled-bcs-for-at-least-4-1961-bcs/
HDOH Dishonesty. WOW. There is too much to list. I’ve got a whole section on it at my blog but the BC numbering problem is a biggie. The falsification of the 1960-64 birth index is another (see http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/1960-64-birth-index-includes-legally-invalid-records/ )
Actually, the whole Putting-It-Together Series, parts 1-5, shows the progression and involvement of the HDOH. Parts 6 and 7 would finish it off but I can’t post those yet. There’s also other stuff that’s illegal as heck, like refusing to let Duncan Sunahara see his sister’s long-form BC, which is tied up in the whole thing of changing the Administrative Rules (which stipulate that standard copies must be reproduced by photographic, dry copy, or typing means - NOT by computer abstract) without going through the process necessary; the director does NOT have discretion to alter the rules that have been lawfully put into effect. There’s the lies about not having a form for doing verifications, along with Okubo’s lie that they don’t issue letters of verification any more even though it’s required by law. There’s the creation of the 2001 “memo” on the same day as Obama released the forgery. There’s the insistence that they can’t reveal anything from his BC but then publicly saying that his BC claims a Hawaii birth. There’s the Vexatious Requestor bill that Fukino requested in order to stop folks like me from being able to find out information that we are legally entitled to receive. There is just way, way too much stuff that could be said. There’s also stuff I can’t tell anybody because my source swore me to silence - stuff that shows a deliberate plan of disinformation and law-breaking on the part of the HDOH. The HDOH is a criminal enterprise. There are a couple of good guys there but as with all government agencies right now and what we’ve seen with both Snowden and Hastings, choosing to blatantly expose the regime can get you dead...