Indeed. There is a possibility 3; It happened exactly as the HDOH says it did.
“To: WildHighlander57
Indeed. There is a possibility 3; It happened exactly as the HDOH says it did.
163 posted on Mon Aug 26 2013 05:07:45 GMT-0500 (CDT) by Natufian (t) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
IF (and I say IF) #3 were the case, then
1) the (so-called) LFBC shown on the white house web site is OK ... WHICH IT IS NOT... See the forensic analysts report to Sheriff Arpaio’s posse.
2) the birth cert numbering is OK... WHICH IT IS NOT ... See butterdezillions research.
3) The HDOH is honest.... WHICH IT IS NOT.... again, see butterdezillions research.
The posse would not have taken their case to congress if there wasn’t a problem with the HDOH ...... AND OTHER DOCUMENTS.
The selective service app is bogus (date postmarked vs date signed, he wasn’t in Hawaii those dates)
0 is using a soc sec number that was issued to ANOTHER PERSON.
The soc sec number is for a guy that had it issued late in life and he passed away without collecting benefits.
It was issued at a time where the first three numbers denoted area in which the person lived/ submitted the form.
The first three numbers for 0 are for Connecticut, and 0 wasn’t there at that time- probably not born yet.
So we have a pattern here; “ once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and three times is enemy action”.
Butterdezillion, need links to your three analyses!