“OK he smoked pot. He’d once been on Ritalin, and had even taken DMT, a hallucinagen.
The report even raised the possibility that cocaine might be found in his apt, but how RELEVANT is it?
No drug was cited as a reason for the crash.
And then let’s say someone is realllllly stoned on pot —how much might it impair DRIVING..?”
I see you conveniently skip over the part where he had METH in his system. That’s not your run of the mill recreational type drug, that’s hardcore. Most people with meth in their system, I think you can safely say are not in their right minds most of the time, even if they didn’t just smoke it before they got in the car. No?
where does the coroner’s report state that?
I saw it, and I must have missed that.
Do u have a link?
Lol, right. I see you've conveniently arrived back at a Hastings Case thread in your usual role as an apologist for Statist-Hits-From-Mars.
Why should anyone believe this same kind of improbable BS shoveled on them when Breitbart was reported to have had a "heart attack"?
Now Hastings suddenly is a "METH-Head? And was a pipe the size of a saxophone found as well? And why not "heroin" AND "an Uzi"?
You STILL fail to explain why Hastings car blew up as though it'd been hit by tank mortar...
Nice try on the narrative, Boogie-Boy. This entire investigation AND Coroner Report rate an EPIC FAIL on credibility.
If a person takes amphetamines it will test as amphetamines. If a person takes a methamphetamine, It will test as an amphetamines. So the article is irresponsible. It cannot be proven that he took Meth. He could’ve taken just an amphetamine, many which are prescribed drugs.