See if you can find in our Constitution some role in the selection of presidents. If, despite the lack of any textual support for the Supreme Court to become involved, you feel that they should do so anyway, ask yourself if the Court has ever shown any inclination to become involved. See if you can find any Supreme Court opinion in which the Court has ever even hinted that it has the power to disqualify presidential candidates because the Court does not believe the candidate is eligible.
Assuming that you believe that our current president is obviously not eligible to be president, ask yourself whether recent conduct of our Supreme Court indicates that the Court agrees with your analysis and also believes that it is empowered to disqualify candidates it believes to be ineligible. Would the justices have volunteered to attend the last two inaugural ceremonies if the justices believed that Obama is some sort of obviously ineligible usurper? Would the Chief Justice volunteer to administer the oath of office twice? What does this kind of conduct tell you about how the Supreme Court views its own role in the selection of presidents? How stupid do you think the justices would feel telling everybody now that they quietly stood by for five years watching an obviously ineligible person pretend to be president? And, that they attended his inaugural ceremonies? And, that they swore him in? Do you sense some sort of problem here?
I believe that the Constitution empowers electors to apply the eligibility standards and to choose our presidents. If you want the electors to apply your precise definition, then send them a copy of your argument. Don't waste any more time on Supreme Court opinions in this area than you spend on reading the other materials that many people here at this website have cited and linked. Remember that you help pick the electors who pick our presidents. So, keep reading and doing the other good things you're doing.
Just follow the Constitution and everything should work out fine. Prince Charles is not going to come over here and win any elections. You have my personal guarantee!!
Good luck! ;-)
The power to remove a President belongs to Congress, not the Supreme Courts. Those seeking redress through the courts have been on a fools errand.
Pursuit of a judicial course to confront the eligibility issue of the man who calls himself Barak Hussein Obama II, delayed whatever serious corrective action could have been brought to expose this usurper.
Congress has in the past removed Senators from among its ranks who were usurpers and not eligible to hold a seat in that legislative body. The question concerning presidential eligibility is so politically explosive that Congress has wisely delegated that power to the Washington (D.C.) District Court, and can be pursued via Quo warranto. This action requires the accused usurper to prove that he/she is eligible for that political position.
This ‘coup d’etat’ of the United States was carefully planned and involved a great deal of money spent corrupting people in important positions. Much of what we assume to be rigid electoral qualification processes is based on principles of honesty exhibited by the respective political parties, a principle missing in both parties. Honesty has tough sledding when people/families are being threatened, or murdered.
I have been answering my door with a loaded shotgun nearby since February 2009, the result of researching BHO2’s background in 2008, particularly in Indonesia. The deaths have been piling up since the middle of the past decade and indicate how intent and serious certain people are in their single minded desire to control the United States government. Yep, a conspiracy, and the paradox is I never believed one was possible until the Democrat Party pulled this off, but they are just a greedy, power-hungry tool of a larger, more extensive powerful group.
I suggest for your viewing pleasure a DVD by Bill Still entitled The Money Masters: How Banks Create The World’s Money. When one gets to the point of all this, it’s simple: it’s all about money and power, and who is going to wield it globally.