The power to remove a President belongs to Congress, not the Supreme Courts. Those seeking redress through the courts have been on a fools errand.
Pursuit of a judicial course to confront the eligibility issue of the man who calls himself Barak Hussein Obama II, delayed whatever serious corrective action could have been brought to expose this usurper.
Congress has in the past removed Senators from among its ranks who were usurpers and not eligible to hold a seat in that legislative body. The question concerning presidential eligibility is so politically explosive that Congress has wisely delegated that power to the Washington (D.C.) District Court, and can be pursued via Quo warranto. This action requires the accused usurper to prove that he/she is eligible for that political position.
This ‘coup d’etat’ of the United States was carefully planned and involved a great deal of money spent corrupting people in important positions. Much of what we assume to be rigid electoral qualification processes is based on principles of honesty exhibited by the respective political parties, a principle missing in both parties. Honesty has tough sledding when people/families are being threatened, or murdered.
I have been answering my door with a loaded shotgun nearby since February 2009, the result of researching BHO2’s background in 2008, particularly in Indonesia. The deaths have been piling up since the middle of the past decade and indicate how intent and serious certain people are in their single minded desire to control the United States government. Yep, a conspiracy, and the paradox is I never believed one was possible until the Democrat Party pulled this off, but they are just a greedy, power-hungry tool of a larger, more extensive powerful group.
I suggest for your viewing pleasure a DVD by Bill Still entitled The Money Masters: How Banks Create The World’s Money. When one gets to the point of all this, it’s simple: it’s all about money and power, and who is going to wield it globally.
Early in our history, there were at least three people who served in the Senate even though they weren't yet 30 years old (as required by the Constitution):
In 1806, Kentucky sent Henry Clay to serve as a Senator when he was just 29 years old.
In 1816, Virginia sent Senator Armistead Mason to serve as a Senator when he was just 28 years old.
In 1818, Tennessee sent John Eaton to serve as a Senator when he was just 28 years old.
Despite these blatant Constitutional violations, the United States just kept moving forward. The more things change, . . .