To: SoConPubbie; don-o
———willing to fight for their principles -——
There you have it. The telling blow to all your arguments.
Sarah has not demonstrated the willingness to fight, to engage in the political battle. She prefers so far to stand on the sideline and cheer. She is unwilling to engage, to actually play the game.
She shows us her ability to kill a reindeer at 500 yards but she does not show her willingness and ability to take a 100 yard shot at Dingy Harry on the senate floor. Dynamism, action is required to prove ability as a politician
Once again, what does she think? We must conclude she knows she lacks the support to prevail
69 posted on
08/20/2013 2:47:01 PM PDT by
bert
((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
To: bert
Sarah has not demonstrated the willingness to fight, to engage in the political battle. She prefers so far to stand on the sideline and cheer. She is unwilling to engage, to actually play the game.
She shows us her ability to kill a reindeer at 500 yards but she does not show her willingness and ability to take a 100 yard shot at Dingy Harry on the senate floor. Dynamism, action is required to prove ability as a politician
And you know that how?
Because she passed on running for President for 2012?
78 posted on
08/20/2013 8:49:20 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: bert
The more I think about it, that has got to be the most laughable thing posted on this thread.
Lacking in any historical proof, in fact, all available historical proof proves the exact opposite.
With her refusal to back down from a fight, she, with the possible exception of Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Mike Lee, and Senator Rand Paul, to a lessor extent, have put all the men of the GOP to shame with her constant take-down of both Zero, the Democrats, and the RINOs in the party.
Could this be why you do not like her?
79 posted on
08/20/2013 8:56:15 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: bert
Sarah has not demonstrated the willingness to fight, to engage in the political battle. She prefers so far to stand on the sideline and cheer. She is unwilling to engage, to actually play the game.
The more I think about it, that has got to be the most laughable thing posted on this thread.
Lacking in any historical proof, in fact, all available historical proof proves the exact opposite.
With her refusal to back down from a fight, she, with the possible exception of Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Mike Lee, and Senator Rand Paul, to a lessor extent, have put all the men of the GOP to shame with her constant take-down of both Zero, the Democrats, and the RINOs in the party.
Could this be why you do not like her?
80 posted on
08/20/2013 8:56:35 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson