Now, I can’t say that I will agree with all the things that the present group who call themselves Libertarians in the sense of a party say, because I think that like in any political movement there are shades, and there are libertarians who are almost over at the point of wanting no government at all or anarchy. I believe there are legitimate government functions. There is a legitimate need in an orderly society for some government to maintain freedom or we will have tyranny by individuals.
Reagan could see - way back in 1975 - that the Lib party was being corrupted. Now anyone can see the corrpution is complete. The Lib Party is as bad as the Democrats.
A rather lame claim.
Of course Reagan wasn’t an anarchist. Neither are most libertarians, nor Libertarians, for that matter.
The platform of the Litertarian party will tell you what libertarianism is about as well as the platform of the Republican party will tell you what a republic is.
The platform of the Litertarian party will tell you what libertarianism is about as well as the platform of the Republican party will tell you what a republic is.