[Aetius]

Jindal supports increasing legal immigration, which is another way of saying he supports increasing the flow of future Democrats. Most Americans oppose increasing legal immigration, so it’s a safe bet that conservatives and Republicans are overwhelmingly opposed to increasing legal immigration.

This should disqualify him, but unfortunately support for never-ending and increased legal immigration is much more common with Republican leaders than Republican voters. Who knows if any of the other contenders mentioned are any better. I would guess that Martinez is not.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Jindal supports increasing legal immigration, which is another way of saying he supports increasing the flow of future Democrats.

How does supporting LEGAL immigration translate to future Democrats?

I know of MANY LEGAL immigrants who have good jobs or start businesses who would NEVER vote for Democrats.

[JoeFromSidney]

Jindal supports increasing legal immigration, which is another way of saying he supports increasing the flow of future Democrats.

Depends on where the legal immigrants come from. My wife is an immigrant from Canada, and she was in the past an officer in the Constitution Party. There are places from which the immigrants are not likely to be welfare addicts.