Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/17/2013 5:45:09 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dontreadthis

By having the Red States withdraw we can then implement a Constitution once again.

The great experiment has taught us much.


2 posted on 08/17/2013 5:55:49 PM PDT by NoLibZone (The reason we are where we are today is the belief that posting on a website will fix the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis
I have two reference works for you.

The first is from the American Legislative Exchange Council.

Proposing Constitutional Amendments by a Convention of the States: A Handbook for State Lawmakers

The second is a 1973 report from the ABA attempting to identify gray areas in the amendatory process to include an Amendments Convention.

Report of the ABA Special Constitutional Convention Study Committee

3 posted on 08/17/2013 5:57:03 PM PDT by Publius (And so, night falls on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

“Runaway Convention”, “Convention Going Rogue”

All undefined terms wrapped in fear and hyperbole.

Levin and others have said from the beginning there is no Constitutional Convention possible. Article V calls for a convention to ***propose*** amendments, but such proposed amendments still need 2/3s to pass and 3/4s to ratify.

These requirements:

*2/3s to pass
*3/4s to ratify

are the safety valves that prevent a disorderly process.

What this commentator is saying is (snooty air and all) “we have to have an esteemed group of constitutional experts in order to avoid a runaway situation”.

I smell B*llSh*t. We don’t need some expert group. We need only elected delegates that represent us.

The ‘Runaway Convention’ is a myth perpetrated by Beltway groupies. God forbid they think that ‘we the unwashed denizens of fly-over country should take matters in to our crude hands’ even though the founders left us that option right there in the Constitution when all else failed.

Excuse my Irish but F’em.


4 posted on 08/17/2013 5:58:23 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

The question; Are we a democracy or a republic?...

Needs to be asked.. Some say a democracy others a republic still others a democratic-republic.. The proven fact that a democracy is always in every case Mob Rule by mobsters.. True of every democracy ever invented and inflicted on modern man.. the conversation MUST BE HAD...

Democrats HIDING under this term need to be EXPOSED..
The word democracy has been made almost a HOLY WORD when democracy is a lie.. ALways was..still is.. and always will be.. Democracy is a lie.. a scam.. a boondoggle. it is the political disease that causes socialism..

America NEEDS to have this conversation.. and face the fact there are two words OMITTED from the american constitution ON PURPOSE.. 1) democracy and 2) democratic.. No where to be found within it.. For very good reason as well..

A Constitutional Spelling Bee needs to happen... by the States..
For the Federal Givernment is double talk without support from the States.. If 2/3rds of the States withdraw unlimited support of it, it becomes a Mushroom.. a cartoon..

Mark Levin is correct.. a dialog MUST HAPPEN.. if only to expose what “IS” and what “ISN’T”... politically in the United States.. The U.S. has NEVER been a democracy.. and trying to make it one.. is sedition and espionage.. and a subtle form of CONQUEST.. Sometimes not too subtle..

America NEEDS to find out what democracy “IS” and ISN’T”..
because currently very few know.. i.e. deprogramming MUST begin..
***


7 posted on 08/17/2013 6:16:13 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis; All
I saw Levin on Fx News. I think that he clarified that the idea of a runaway convention destroying the constitutional republic is a myth. This is because the product of a con-con is only a proposed amendment to the constitution, as opposed to a new amendment to the Constitution.

So even if the convention decided on a proposed amendment that declared the USA to be under a dictatorship for example, the states can choose to ignore such a propoposed amendment as opposed to ratifying it. So the only loss with a runaway constitutional convention that produces an unpopular proposed amendment is that the convention was a waste of time. Corrections welcome.

On the other hand, if patriots really want to clean up DC with minimum effort, please consider the following. Patriots and former Obama supporters need to get off of their couches and elect a 2/3 conservative majority to each House of Congress in the 2014 elections. This is because supermajority control of Congress by conservatives will have the power, under the Constitution's Clause 2 of Section 7 of Article I, to override presidential vetoes. In other words, Congress will be able to repeal Obamacare, for example, without Obama's signature.

8 posted on 08/17/2013 6:17:59 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Fifteen percent of America listens to talk radio more than once a week.

Id suppose his audience is about half that.

It seems to me the odds of reaching anyone but the true believers is about zero...

If a conservative wants to get the message out the echo chamber of talk radio/TV is not the way to do it IMHO


11 posted on 08/17/2013 6:26:02 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

The guy who was on with Huckabee rattled off a website but I can’t find it - did anyone catch the exact url?


13 posted on 08/17/2013 6:29:31 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis
Reposting from the other thread this morning...

I think the apprehension regarding the original convention is a red herring because we didn't have the existing Constitution in force at that time.

Our Constitution today says that it can only be changed by amendment, otherwise EVERYTHING in it now is "supreme law of the land." You can't have a convention of delegates change the way the amendments are ratified when the rules for ratification are laid out in the Constitution. The amendment process has to follow the law as it exists now, not how others would amend it to be, nor how the law was during the Articles of Confederation before the Constitution was ratified.

You can't have a runaway convention decide to rewrite the Constitution unless they do it one amendment at a time, such as "Amendment XXVIII: The Constitution as written is abolished and replaced with the following..." then get the delegates to vote for it, then get 3/4ths of the states to ratify it.

They would have to do it incrementally, and then form a voting bloc to vote for the liberal set of amendments and against the conservative ones. Then the states get to ratify the amendments that pass the convention, again one amendment at a time.

One WOULD have to watch for the sequencing of ratifying amendments, because early ratified amendments would be law that could affect later ratification of amendments, unless "start dates" are included to defer their effect untile the entire ratification process completes.

One thing the convention cannot change is the concept of 50 states. The states predated the Constitution, and the People and the States "ordained and established this Constitution" to create a Federal Government as a body to manage the relations between the states vis a vis foreign governments. The states still remain as sovereign entities. If a radical group tried to create a new constitution that terminates the sovereignty of states and replaces them with a single continental government, I can't imagine that 3/4ths of the states would vote for their own demise.

-PJ

14 posted on 08/17/2013 6:32:54 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Ok I have a question, What if we DO get some(or all) of these Amendments passed and the then Illegitimate Federal Govt flips us the “bird” and refuses to leave, then WHAT do we do?!


17 posted on 08/17/2013 6:41:56 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

I suspect Mr. Levin is well aware of the Madison Coalition. I’d love to hear his thoughts.

I suspect if he felt something like that were needed, he would have included it in his book.


19 posted on 08/17/2013 6:45:04 PM PDT by upchuck (My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance. We'll see about that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Mr Levin is one of our second set of Founding Fathers. Rush is also one.


21 posted on 08/17/2013 6:48:38 PM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis
I saw Levin on Hannity last night, and I agree with his ideas. If there is going to be a return to our republican form of government, it has to start in the states. But...Congress, the Obammunist, and the federal courts will never honor any kind of Constitutional process, because the Constitution is dead to them. They don't obey it now, so why should they obey it when a bunch of uppity states tell them to?

When 2/3 of the states get together and decide to collectively tell DC to kiss their a**es, then we'll be getting somewhere. None of this crap of getting 2/3 of the states to pass amendments, then sending delegates to Congress, hat in hand, to try to get them to play along. Form the coalition of states, draft a proclamation saying "We the People of the undersigned states do hereby declare to the national government in Washington DC, that we will not abide by the following un-Constitutional laws:" then list them. Then make a list of the un-Constitutional departments, agencies, administrations, bureaus, directorates, and offices that won't be obeyed because they aren't specifically mentioned in Articles 1-3. Then do the same for treaties, EOs, Presidential Decision Directives, and any other rule by fiat. Then lay copies on the desks of the Obammunist, John Boner, Hemorrhoid Reid, and Benedict Arnold Roberts.

Yeah, I know where that will lead, but we're headed there anyway, so we might as well find out who our friends are beforehand.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

26 posted on 08/17/2013 6:53:27 PM PDT by wku man (It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Have to check them out. Sound good.


39 posted on 08/17/2013 7:17:46 PM PDT by ZULU ((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/) Obama, do you hear me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Mark Levin’s second amendment process is excellent, but, it suffers from one severe drawback, dumBO and the Bolshies will have destroyed country in much less time than getting a Constitutional convention completed.

That leaves the Second Amendment process.


46 posted on 08/17/2013 7:50:49 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis
We have a Constitution now that is being ignored. Any new amendments will also be ignored.

Fundamentally, rule of law and the Constitution depends upon the **good will** of HONEST citizens! Unfortunately, nearly all Dems and many Repubs have absolutely no allegiance to upholding the the rule of law and are not honest people of good will.

Laws and constitutional amendments will NOT NOT NOT coral evil. Evil will leak through every time.

47 posted on 08/17/2013 7:58:05 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dontreadthis

Anything they propose still has to be approved by 3/4 of the states.


55 posted on 08/17/2013 10:34:27 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson