This judge is an idiot. There is no "constitutional right" for U.S. citizens to be covered by Sharia law.
1 posted on
08/16/2013 11:33:05 PM PDT by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: grundle
Where does this court clown get the authority to do this? She sounds like she might be a real ditz.
2 posted on
08/16/2013 11:39:58 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Former Rodeo Clown Sensitivity Training class valedictorian.)
To: grundle
The case will proceed to the Supreme Court, where the four liberal guys will be hard-pressed to agree on this ruling. You can’t make up pieces of the Constitution and insist to the public that you have fake rights.
To: grundle
A native of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Miles-LaGrange, received a certificate from the University of Ghana in Accra, Ghana, West Africa in 1973, and graduated cum laude from Vassar College in 1974. She then received her J.D. from Howard University School of Law in Washington, DC in 1977. There, she was an editor of The Howard Law Journal.
Nominated by Clinton. No surprises that she ruled this way. She’s an affirmative action appointee.
4 posted on
08/16/2013 11:40:47 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: grundle
The part of the law that really is stupid is the part prohibiting courts from considering international law. If a foreign company invests in a US plant, what law applies? This is just the kind of well intentioned but poorly thought out idiocy that makes us look stupid. And it would have meant much less investment in Oklahoma.
5 posted on
08/16/2013 11:51:28 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: grundle
8 posted on
08/17/2013 12:03:02 AM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: itsahoot
9 posted on
08/17/2013 12:05:17 AM PDT by
itsahoot
(It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
To: grundle
so individual law trumps society’s law?
10 posted on
08/17/2013 12:06:35 AM PDT by
4rcane
To: grundle
On Thursday the U.S. district judge made the ban permanent when she issued an order forbidding the State Election Board from certifying the election.
The state needs to stand up to this usurpation.
11 posted on
08/17/2013 12:11:29 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: grundle
It is very instructive to track how many god-awful decisions are handed down by female judges.
VERY few women possess the requisite judicial temperament.
Wait, did I type something politically incorrect?
12 posted on
08/17/2013 12:12:14 AM PDT by
man_in_tx
(Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
To: grundle
![](http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTg1bDeZxx965NWVIcRyoUj7HSQsOgzt4OM8KzKb-vZzjHuU-S1_Q)
Well. I'm just shocked!
13 posted on
08/17/2013 12:15:11 AM PDT by
BigCinBigD
(...Was that okay?)
To: grundle
Take off the robe; put on a burka, “judge”.
To: grundle
16 posted on
08/17/2013 12:25:02 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: grundle
The judge says that upholding an individuals constitutional rights is more important than the will of the masses my constitutional right to free association and religious freedoms doesn't seem to amount to a hill of beans when i'm forced to provide my businesses services to a buinch of sodomites
18 posted on
08/17/2013 12:35:05 AM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: grundle
According to Sharia Law, women are considered subservient, second-class citizens. So how does this moron with a JD reconcile treating a woman in such a way that clearly violates the woman's constitutional right to be equal an citizen?
liberalism is a disease.
19 posted on
08/17/2013 12:35:30 AM PDT by
South40
To: grundle
“U.S. District Judge Vickie Miles-Legrange issued a temporary injunction after a Muslim resident sued”
There is now. This is legal precedent that Sharia Law takes priority over American jurisprudence.
To: grundle
*sigh* another hyphenated name..
24 posted on
08/17/2013 1:00:45 AM PDT by
cardinal4
(The GOP, the ultimate battered wife? Or willing co-conspirators? You decide..)
To: grundle
Vickie Miles-Deranged should be impeached for incompetance.
27 posted on
08/17/2013 1:31:39 AM PDT by
D Rider
To: grundle
Ok, so what would the judge do if Oklahoma would pass a law requiring courts to use Biblical law in deciding cases?
29 posted on
08/17/2013 2:14:08 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: grundle
Is that the same Sharia law that marries children to old men, and mutilates female sex organs? Sounds completely Constitutional to me!
Most dangerous place to be after a terrorist attack is to be between a politician and a mosque.
30 posted on
08/17/2013 2:31:26 AM PDT by
Dogbert41
(Thy Kingdom come!)
To: grundle
The judge says that upholding an individuals constitutional rights is more important than the will of the masses. I would agree if indeed the will of the masses violated the constitutional rights of an individual. However, Im not sure how its an individuals constitutional right to have a US court consider sharia or international law when adjudicating a case. Exactly. It's not. The only cases that should matter in a U.S. court decision are previous U.S. court decisions, not foreign or sharia. I wonder if her ruling would have been the same if, instead of sharia, it was some court set up by a group of Christians.
31 posted on
08/17/2013 3:09:45 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson