Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six

Ah, I misread the article. He was not a 19-YEAR OLD, but, rather, someone who had already served for 19 years. Still, in my day (I am 62) one did not earn the title of veteran until after one had separated from the military (i.e., via discharge or retirement). I served in the USAF from 1970 to 1974. Ergo, I am a veteran. However, I was not a veteran in 1973.


10 posted on 08/15/2013 5:34:14 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six

I joined in 2006 (active-duty Army) and was told by my Drill Sergeant during Basic Training that we were all Veterans.


13 posted on 08/15/2013 5:40:22 PM PDT by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six
Yes, your correction is accurate.

But the real question is why someone would sign up in 1994, when our sink Emporer in chief was President.

I wouldn't go near the military during Clinton's term, but I'd get out as fast as possible under Obama.

15 posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:09 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ought-six

After 180 days on active duty, a person is considered a veteran, provided they haven’t been convicted of a
violation of UCMJ articles.


33 posted on 08/15/2013 8:38:11 PM PDT by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson