I am thinking more and More that Mark Levin’s option is the last best hope...
If it fails we are so SOL it isn’t funny...
Our Constitution was meant for a moral people and we now have immoral people in power.
While I like some of what Mark Levin has to say, his proposal to amend the Constitution is plainly misguided. 3/4 of the legislatures would have to approve. Said another way, 1/4 of the states could derail any such attempt. More than 1/4 of the states are perfectly fine and happy with the status quo. Can you see NY or CA or RI agreeing to any of this? So changes to the Constitution are not happening.
Waste your time passing whatever amendments you want. You can count on five justices ruling that those amendments don’t apply or mean something other than the clearly worded intent. We’re way past fixing things with amendments.
I will buy Mark Levin’s book. I will vote for Palin if she runs.
Other than that, I will try to stay under the radar and wait in readiness for the SHTF moment and respond accordingly.
I think I am going to switch from popcorn to peanuts.
With all due respect to Mr. Levin, there’s nothing wrong with the Constitution. Previous generations of justices have already decided against much of what the corrupt, unconstitutionaly big federal government is doing today.
The problem is that generations of apathetic, working parents who use public schools mainly to babysit their children, have not been making sure that their children are being taught the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers. And Progressive socialist lawmakers have seized the opportunity provided by widespread ignorance of the federal government’s limited powers to trade constitutionally indefensible federal spending programs for votes from an “army” of low-information voters to keep socialists in power.
Yeah a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION! It will be subverted. Say goodbye to the 1, 2, 4, 5 Amendments for starters. Then they will do away with the Electoral College because the intellectually challenged will not realize that with the Dims version of voter ID, Chicago alone could print enough ballots to elect the President
I am reading and rereading Article V. I read that it all boils down to Congress, both Houses, having a final go-no go as to calling a ‘convention’ of states’. Though the Constitution is explicitly worded to say ‘shall call’ I will bet Reed and the Democratic Senate would stonewall that part of the Constitution.
We can learn one thing from the communists, and it is: attack on all fronts at all times.
This is a good front to open.
5.56mm