Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: SeekAndFind
My vote is for Levin. With his knowledge of the Constitution, he would make the pretenders look stupid.
2 posted on
08/15/2013 8:00:31 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: SeekAndFind
Would rather see Chris Wallace, Charles Payne or Larry Kudlow.
3 posted on
08/15/2013 8:01:35 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: SeekAndFind
I’d like to see Mark Steyn moderating a presidential debate.
4 posted on
08/15/2013 8:03:05 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: SeekAndFind
I would agree w Levin, and propose
Hugh Hewitt. Hannity? He's a great American, but would be too predictable for the forum.
5 posted on
08/15/2013 8:04:08 AM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: SeekAndFind
The fact of the matter is anyone can pretend to be a conservative long enough to make it through a debate. The problem is that our media won’t speak to the BS a candidate has pulled that proves they’re pretending.
7 posted on
08/15/2013 8:04:13 AM PDT by
TheZMan
(Buy more ammo.)
To: SeekAndFind
The time to fight was last year, but Mr. nicey nicey go along don’t rock the boat was the nominee and thus head of the party. Dope!
To: SeekAndFind
Limbaugh, maybe. Hannity? not on your life.
Levin, DEFINITELY!!!
9 posted on
08/15/2013 8:06:17 AM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: SeekAndFind
For equality, both party’s debates need to be hosted by these guys, just as they are now and in the past, have always been hosted by their liberal versions.
13 posted on
08/15/2013 8:07:13 AM PDT by
ansel12
( The difference between libertarianism and conservatism is radical social leftism, not economics)
To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, like that's gonna happen.
What network is gonna “host” a debate with one of these as moderator? Even IF one does, the RATS will simply decline to appear.
Remember, Presidential debates are WHOLY a construct of TV. Before 1960 there was NEVER a Presidential debate.
14 posted on
08/15/2013 8:10:04 AM PDT by
Roccus
To: SeekAndFind
How about Neil Cavuto or Michelle Malkin?
15 posted on
08/15/2013 8:11:02 AM PDT by
hummingbird
(THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He's got a great plan!)
To: SeekAndFind
Great. GOP establishment wants one of the establishment hacks to keep any debate within the accepted subject matter. Don’t fool yourselves into thinking that all of them aren’t bought and paid for.
18 posted on
08/15/2013 8:12:32 AM PDT by
Orangedog
(An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
To: SeekAndFind
Would Christie show up for a debate moderated by them under those circumstances? So? All candidates in the 2012 GOP primary showed up for debates moderated by all-marxist panels/moderators...you know damn well they were voting democrat/communist on Election Day.
19 posted on
08/15/2013 8:12:53 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: SeekAndFind
23 posted on
08/15/2013 8:16:23 AM PDT by
RedMDer
(http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
To: SeekAndFind
Partnering with these three would vastly improve the perception of the RNC The perception of the RNC would improve if only they would stand for something. The party is deeply confused and conflicted at a time when the country needs clear thought leadership and direction. There is a huge opportunity to lead the way out of the mess the Democrats have created.
To: SeekAndFind
Personally, I would prefer Michael Savage. When he’s off his meds, he is entertaining as hell.
33 posted on
08/15/2013 8:33:23 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: SeekAndFind
The RNC is trying to stay relevant as it becomes increasingly clear that the GOP is moving leftward.
Why not put this story out to get us talking about something else other than amnesty or the rigged primary process to give the 2016 nomination to a RINO.
Frankly, the Hannity’s, Limbaugh’s and Levin’s should be asking the questions-tough conservative questions of the RINO’s in the if they want to do any good.
34 posted on
08/15/2013 8:37:26 AM PDT by
Nextrush
(A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE AT THE TOP OF MY LIST)
To: SeekAndFind
Oh please not Hannity, please not Hannity.
We need to get our prayer warriors working on this.
36 posted on
08/15/2013 8:48:03 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(People are idiots.)
To: SeekAndFind
Does Reince Priebus strike anyone as having the balls to do this? It’s all theatre.....
37 posted on
08/15/2013 8:48:08 AM PDT by
capydick
(''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
To: SeekAndFind
Can’t we just have an internet debate? Bypass the MSM altogether.
To: SeekAndFind
Why only one? We have to sit through countless debates moderated by the enemies of conservatism. Why not give each of them a debate to run?
Rush, Levin, Hannity, Steyn, Malkin, they all deserve a shot. Shut the liberals out completely.
46 posted on
08/15/2013 9:17:19 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
(Army dad. And damned proud.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson