Replies

To: DannyTN; Balding_Eagle

So now you've changed your story from 2.7 to over 12 percent. and we still haven't discussed sick days mandatory pregnancy days vacation time down time for holidays and glossing over retirement and healthcare costs and such is a nice try on your part but it don't fly. IT ALL ADDS COSTS to the bottom line!

Don't forget that the FEDGOV can arbitrarily change the compliance regs and tax laws which then cost even more money.

If you notice every time I point out stuff you were wrong about you go "Well yeah but..." and then try and coverup the fact your first claim was totally wrong.

43 posted on 08/14/2013 7:00:48 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)

"So now you've changed your story from 2.7 to over 12 percent. and we still haven't discussed sick days mandatory pregnancy days vacation time down time for holidays and glossing over retirement and healthcare costs and such is a nice try on your part but it don't fly. IT ALL ADDS COSTS to the bottom line!"

I have gone to 12%. But your claim was 50%. And you've offered no support for that number. At least you can see exactly how I've quantified mine.

Sick days are not a requirement here in TN or by Federal law. If it's voluntary on the behalf of the company, then it's part of the wage differential. It's not a "compliance" cost.

By pregnancy days, I assume you mean the Federal Family leave act. Yeah, you are required to let the employee have time off. You aren't required to pay them a dime for that time off. For most companies that's not a major cost. There is only a very small percentage of employees that take off due to pregnancy each year/

And again, retirement and healthcare costs do add to the bottom line, but they aren't "COMPLIANCE". Because they aren't required. They are part of the wage differential compared to foreign countries, but they aren't COMPLIANCE.

44 posted on 08/14/2013 7:16:42 PM PDT by DannyTN

So why do you keep bringing up retirement and health care costs when they weren't required and weren't compliance.

Oh yeah, that's right, because I'm only up to 12% and you claimed compliance costs were 50% of salary costs.

46 posted on 08/14/2013 7:26:19 PM PDT by DannyTN

So why do you keep bringing up retirement and health care costs when they weren't required and weren't compliance.

Oh yeah, that's right, because I'm only up to 12% and you claimed compliance costs were 50% of salary costs.

47 posted on 08/14/2013 7:26:19 PM PDT by DannyTN

To: Mad Dawgg; DannyTN

Thanks Dawgg, you’re pointing out his ignorance.

From his posts it’s easy to see he’s all hat, no cattle. Even the tone shows that.

55 posted on 08/14/2013 8:53:14 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (When America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794