To: NotYourAverageDhimmi
How would they understand the trial, if it’s conducted in English?
2 posted on
08/13/2013 7:41:00 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: Jonty30
the same question I posed to these idiots at the CA DMV when the written test is given in 75 languages and the road signs are in English..
5 posted on
08/13/2013 7:45:13 PM PDT by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
To: Jonty30
I guess they can just read your body language or use some personal form of profiling, whatever it is, the judgement sure seems to say that the law, investigations, evidence, lawyer arguments and even the jury deliberations of the other 11 jurors, don’t mean anything important.
I guess in time we can shorten some trials to a quick look at the defendant and a simple thumbs up or thumbs down, based on that first impression.
11 posted on
08/13/2013 7:54:22 PM PDT by
ansel12
( The difference between libertarianism and conservatism is radical social leftism, not economics)
To: Jonty30
doesn’t matter, verdicts are decided on the basis of skin color
To: Jonty30
How would they understand the trial, if it’s conducted in English? -----------
I'm guessing translators would translate the testimony in such a way as to not interrupt the trial, and the juror would hear it via headphones.
To: Jonty30
Hey it worked out for OJ and his jury.
21 posted on
08/13/2013 8:29:55 PM PDT by
relictele
(A community vigilant in enforcing economic, racial and social equality. It was called Jonestown.)
To: Jonty30
What a pesky, racist person you must be to actually expect the jury to understand the language the trial may (or may not) be conducted in. /sarc/
Seriously, this sounds like ample grounds for appeal from any conviction.
33 posted on
08/14/2013 3:57:11 AM PDT by
Pecos
(Kritarchy: government by the judges)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson