Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Left Vs. the Redskins
Townhall.com ^ | August 13, 2013 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 08/13/2013 11:45:00 AM PDT by Kaslin

The online magazine Slate announced last week that it will never again refer to the Washington's National Football League team, the Redskins, by its name.

The name, according to Slate, offends American Indians, and therefore should be dropped. And until such time, Slate will never mention it. It will become, in effect, the R-word.

The article, to its credit, acknowledged that the term "redskins" was not coined as a racist epithet:

"The word redskin has a relatively innocent history. As Smithsonian linguist Ives Goddard has shown, European settlers in the 18th century seem to have adopted the term from Native Americans, who used 'red skin' to describe themselves, and it was generally a descriptor, not an insult."

So, then, what's so bad about the name Redskins?

Slate Argument One: "Here's a quick thought experiment: Would any team, naming itself today, choose "Redskins" or adopt the team's Indian-head logo? Of course it wouldn't."

Response: There are many teams with names that wouldn't be adopted today. Who would name a team the "Red Sox," "White Sox," "Packers," "Dodgers," "Forty-Niners," "Steelers," or, for that matter, "Yankees?"

Slate Argument Two: "While the name Redskins is only a bit offensive, it's extremely tacky and dated -- like an old aunt who still talks about 'colored people.' ... "

Response: Since Slate dismisses the term "colored people" as "tacky and dated," why doesn't it call on the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (the NAACP), to change its name?

Slate Argument Three: "Changing how you talk changes how you think. ... Replacing 'same-sex marriage' with 'marriage equality' helped make gay marriage a universal cause rather than a special pleading."

Response: It's nice to have at least one left-wing source acknowledge how the left changes language to promote its causes. When more and more people began to suspect that global warming was not about to bring an apocalypse, and that, at the very least, it is in a pause mode, the left changed the term to "climate change."

The "marriage equality" substitution for "same-sex marriage" is just one more example of dishonest manipulation of English.

Orwellian manipulation of language by the left would be reason enough to oppose dropping "Redskins," a nearly 80-year-old tradition venerated by millions.

Argument Four is the key argument, offered by the Atlantic, in its support of Slate:

Response: "Whether people 'should' be offended by it or not doesn't matter; the fact that some people are offended by it does."

This is classic modern liberalism. It is why I have dubbed our age "The Age of Feelings."

In classic progressive fashion, the Atlantic writer commits two important errors.

First, it does matter "whether people 'should' feel offended." If we ceased using all arguments or descriptions because some people feel offended, we would cease using any arguments or descriptions. We should use the "reasonable person" test to determine what is offensive, not the "some people are offended" criterion.

On a recent broadcast of my radio show, I played excerpts of winning songs from the recent Eurovision Contest. One of them was from Hungary, and after I announced the Hungarian title, I jokingly translated it as "Let's invade Romania."

A man called up, and in unaccented English said he was of Hungarian stock and that I should apologize for offending him and Hungarians generally. I told him that his taking offense at a harmless joke was his problem, not what I said.

Teaching people to take offense is one of the left's black arts. Outside of sex and drugs, the left is pretty much joyless and it kills joy constantly. The war on the "Redskins" name is just the latest example.

Second, it is the left that specializes in offending: labeling the Tea Party racist, public cursing, displaying crucifixes in urine, and regularly calling Republicans evil (Paul Krugman, in his New York Times column last month, wrote that the Republican mindset "takes positive glee in inflicting further suffering on the already miserable." For such people to find the name "Redskins" offensive is a hoot.

The New Republic announced on Thursday that it would follow Slate's lead. And Mother Jones said on Friday it, too, will avoid using this R-word. They join The Washington City Paper, Washington online site DCist.com, the Kansas City Star and football writers at the Buffalo News and the Philadelphia Daily News. If the Redskins have any pride, they should not allow reporters from any of these publications into the Redskins locker room or give them free seats to any Redskins games.

The logo of the National Hockey League team, the Ottawa Senators, features a helmeted male senator of the Roman Empire. In the name of not offending the transgendered and of gender equality, the left will one day find that offensive, too; and demand that the logo feature a helmeted female as well.

That is one of many reasons to fight the left on changing Redskins name. The left never stops.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: football; nfl; redskins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Kaslin

As if Slate readers watch football anyway.


21 posted on 08/13/2013 1:56:48 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Its all about some white people trying to feel morally superior to other white people. The former being nothing but a joke.


22 posted on 08/13/2013 1:59:27 PM PDT by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

The Catholic priest was probably furious because the word Hail as in Hail Mary had been used


23 posted on 08/13/2013 4:12:40 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How many people know that the baseball team that played in Atlanta before the Braves moved there was known as the “Atlanta Crackers” which is supposedly a derogatory term for whites? An of course you might be a “redneck” if.... Redneck was once a derogatory term for lower income whites [according to a PBS documentary the term was originally use to refer to striking coal miners who wore red around their necks to distinguish themselves from the Pinkertons hired by the coal mines.]


24 posted on 08/13/2013 4:48:59 PM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Perdogg; campaignPete R-CT; NFHale; sickoflibs; AuH2ORepublican; GOPsterinMA; Viennacon; ...

I’m surprised it’s taken them this long to ramp up their hissyfit on the Redskins name.

They got “Washington Bullets” changed to “Wizards” a long time ago.

If I owned a sports team my mascot would be an Indian with an AK-47. Chief Pop a Cap.


25 posted on 08/13/2013 4:55:23 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; All

“If I owned a sports team my mascot would be an Indian with an AK-47. Chief Pop a Cap.”

And the team’s theme song could be “In you ass!”


26 posted on 08/13/2013 5:00:20 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Time to musk up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

OK - I will no longer refer to the online magazine “Slate” by it’s name (after that one anyway)....I will substitute “Jock Itch”.


27 posted on 08/13/2013 6:40:11 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

And he should be standing up in the driver seat of an open-top SUV.


28 posted on 08/14/2013 3:18:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Impy

: )


29 posted on 08/14/2013 9:26:28 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens. KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; GOPsterinMA

A Hummer would be even better. Or maybe he should be sitting on an environmentally unfriendly large tank toilet!


30 posted on 08/14/2013 1:40:48 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson