Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gen.Blather

When Army, any Army, have to support their ground troops, there is no other choice but to involve tanks. Air Force can give limited support against concentrated targets but it’s impossible to do that against single targets with RPG’s on their shoulder. Regarding your statement about Israeli tanks in Lebanon, loses was minimal but most important that military can learn and improve defense of the tanks in the future.


43 posted on 08/11/2013 7:50:32 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: QQQQ

“When Army, any Army, have to support their ground troops, there is no other choice but to involve tanks”

I worked on the tank for 10 years, but I don’t know anything about tactics. The Army guys I talked to say it’s worthless in Afghanistan; no roads to speak of. They have replaced it with “tanks” built on a 6 ton truck chassis. So, the troops are getting support, just not from 105’s. But they say their engagements are taking place at 100 yards with machine guns. The truck “tanks” can apparently mulch the ground at that range. Target killing is done by drones and circling fighters/bombers and remotely launched missiles. (Hope I’m not getting this wrong. Speak up Army guys.) The real problem with the tank is getting it there and keeping it fed with fuel once it’s there.


49 posted on 08/11/2013 8:22:05 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson