Posted on 08/07/2013 5:13:27 PM PDT by drewh
DURHAM, N.H. It's a long time before New Hampshire's 2016 first-in-the-nation presidential primary, but a poll shows Democrats favoring Hillary Clinton and no clear Republican leader.
The WMUR Granite State Poll finds most Democrats and Republicans are undecided and no one's declared their candidacy. But if the primary were held today, 62 percent of likely Democratic voters would support Clinton, New Hampshire's 2008 primary winner.
Twenty-one percent of likely Republican primary voters would support New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan had 16 percent; former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush had 10 percent.
The phone poll of 516 residents was conducted July 18-29. It had a sampling margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points overall and 7 percentage points among likely Republican and Democratic voters
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
True. At the same time, Rudy Giuliani was considered a “lock” for the GOP nomination.
By all rights, it’s Rimshot Joe Biden’s “turn” to be president.
I remember the smartest guy I know telling me in Jan 08 “there’s no way Americans are gonna vote for a guy named Baraq Hussein for President”
Hell, I don’t have the money, but if we we’re little with RINO’s I would run as a Independent just to keep the RINOS out. NO more friggin RINO’S and Karl Rove backed candidates!
I think Hillary will crush SlowJoe and Cuomo by March 2016.
But I was completely wrong in 2008. I didn’t realize that the Chicago political mob had the info on Arkancides and could blackmail the Clintons.
BJ and Hillary couldn’t use their vaunted private detective force to publicize the truth about Obama.
Seems to me that Hillary won’t have much to brag about on the campaign trail. Obama has been a failure and Americans are waking up to that fact and and Hillary is thoroughly complicit in that failure. After another 3 years of his “fundamental transformation of America”, I think Americans are going to be hesitant to vote for anyone promising to deliver more of the same.
Throw Trey Gowdy in there and see what happens.
I hope I'm wrong.
Check this vanity DU thread:
Why on Earth should we nominate a presidential candidate who voted for war with Iraq?
Last edited Wed Aug 7, 2013, 01:43 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
It was a colossal disaster, and completely avoidable. Most elected Democrats voted against war, but not the ones who wanted to look “presidential” - Hillary, Biden, Kerry, Edwards, and the rest of that crowd.
Looking “presidential” in exchange for hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Why would we trust one of these people with our future?
Do the anti-Clinton forces within the Democratic Party have anyone who could be even a half-way plausible opponent for the nomination in 2016? Hillary may have as much opposition as Obama had in 2012.
Given the demographic trends, I think you’re correct.
The only confounding factors I can see would be
1) markets finally puke on money creation making entitlements too expensive to continue at present levels
2) a 3rd party candidate (would have to be a liberal analog of Ross Perot, egotistical, famous and rich) lets us win with a plurality.
Bloomberg is one possibility, but he’s tight with the Clintons and would never oppose Hillary.
Ted Cruz will be star speaker at Iowa GOP dinner this fall
http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2013/08/05/ted-cruz-will-be-star-speaker-at-iowa-gop-dinner-this-fall/article
Hillary Clinton is a very ill old broad with more baggage than a railroad porter.
Sort of like announcing whats the best roadkill.
“Throw Trey Gowdy in there and see what happens.”
There is a real household name.
I think the Clinton machine can shred most all potential challengers.
Baraq had the “nuclear weapon” of the Chicago mob and was able to completely neutralize their most valuable asset. Ironic that Hillary had the FBI files but the Chicago mob had the scoop on Arkancides.
Can we survive such an economic system? Sure...depending on your value of "survive". While Europe certainly sees its share of economic crises, it's not as if they've seen their economies utterly collapse in the last 50 years. However, things that occur regularly in such countries such as crippling public sector strikes and massive redistribution of income are, I'm afraid, not too far in America's future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.