I remember in the couple of months prior to 911 reading reports in the press of “chatter”, that something big was coming.
In the aftermath, we know now that Saddam had advised his cabinet to expect something big. A “false flag attack”.
the words own term “phoney scandal”s might yet HAUNT the regime!??
They don’t what they’re doing. It’s easier to go after American citizens.
It feels like we are being conned by the government....AGAIN.
interesting take
Squirell!
I heard it was because of a video!
Why should ANYONE believe a KNOWN and PROVEN LIAR and ID THIEF?
Breaking, Cover-Up?: Libyan President Indicates U.S. Knew Date And Time Of Embassy Attack In Advance… September 16, 2012…and he cites intercepted communications to prove it. Keep in mind also that if this is true, then Obama’s main surrogate for the matter on the Sunday talk shows, UN Ambassador Susan Rice (who said on these shows that the whole thing was NOT a pre-planned Al Qaeda operation but merely a movie protest spun out of control), spent the entire day today either lying through her teeth as it is simply impossible to believe that she went on these shows with no approval of her talking points by the White House, or the White House, hoping they could ultimately hide the truth from everybody, including her, lied to her and said they had no evidence indicating Al Qaeda when in fact they had these intercepted communications…
If I was a conspiracist I might think this just was another bogus, trumped up scam by the administraion.
This time the purpose would be to attempt to discredit and shut down critics of Obama’s BIG GOV and its intrusive intelligence gathering.
They want to show us how NSA style prying saved the day and prevented a great loss of American lives by averting attacks by Al Qaeda - who Obama told us he had whipped back in 2012.
Pretty sure this is to bolster NSA programs in the easily led american publics view. This shows that even though we despise the,”we need them on that wall”. And a majority will fall for it.
So...
Are they going to re-open the embassies?
If so, when, why, what criteria is being used, which ones?
If not, why?
2. With the outing of NSA massive data collection operation, it is very possible, if not probable, that our enemies are playing cat and mouse with us. They know that by planting false reports they will cause havoc. And, as we see, it can be successful.
Also, recall that before Bush was out office AQ and Taliban had ceased using internet and telephone communication because it was being intercepted by the US intelligence. What caused to begin again knowing it would tip off their enemies - that's us.
Well, that's my analysis - what do you think???
Someone should ask him this question: "So, Mr. Carney, are you saying that the State Department is being much more proactive in protecting our embassies than it was when Hillary Clinton was running the depatment?"
more wag the dog from the expert at it, the hoax that sits in the WH
obama:
What are we going to do about these scandals and Americans turning against me over this nsa garbage?
jarrett:
Not to worry... we have dealt with it. We just issued an alert on some stale intel and we are closing 27 embassies... early reports are that the sheep are buying it”
Yes, but they needed the distraction now, not months ago. All the crap His Arrogance and his RICO administration has been up to requires the distraction now. MSM pimps and prostitutes are to pick up their scripts by Monday afternoon.
It’s Love Your NSA Week.
Easier to do when the media shouts “terrorist threat” 24/7.
Or it could be that Peter King is covering for The Obama similar to the way he covered for Bill Clinton back in the day.
Barry closed the embassies because he didn't want his birthday golf outing interrupted. When bin Laden was offed, they called Barry in from the golf course.