Replies

1 posted on 08/03/2013 4:16:01 PM PDT by naturalman1975

To: naturalman1975

That “high degree of interoperability” is seriously threatened by the BHO2 administration.

2 posted on 08/03/2013 4:25:19 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITIZEN: BORN IN THE USA OFCITIZEN PARENTS)

To: naturalman1975

gargantuan behemoths

Odd way to describe our gems of the ocean.

3 posted on 08/03/2013 4:39:22 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)

To: naturalman1975

I came for the pictures of big boats and guns and planes. We have rules for that, too.

6 posted on 08/03/2013 5:02:41 PM PDT by AlmaKing

To: naturalman1975

this thread is in serious violation of the FR carrier porn rule !

7 posted on 08/03/2013 5:04:51 PM PDT by tomkat

To: naturalman1975

Can you imagine one of the US media writing this?

I don’t think it would read the same at all.

11 posted on 08/03/2013 5:10:03 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)

To: naturalman1975

Great ship, but, I do dislike the trend of naming carriers after Presidents. Has a political tinge to it and seems lazy.

For the days of Hornet, Ranger, Midway, Cowpens, Independence, Intrepid, Saratoga, Constellation, etc.

A new carrier named Glory or Benjamin Franklin or Concord or some such would be fantastic to hear.

23 posted on 08/03/2013 8:34:27 PM PDT by FAA

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794