Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Obamacare to Work, Everyone Must Be In
NY Times ^ | Aug 3, 2013 | By ROBERT H. FRANK

Posted on 08/03/2013 1:43:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

TWO beliefs continue to shape debate on Obamacare. First, pre-existing medical conditions shouldn’t prevent people from obtaining affordable health insurance. And second, people who don’t want health insurance shouldn’t be forced by the government to purchase it.

These may seem to be reasonable positions. But they are incompatible. That’s been shown by historical events, and it’s now being strikingly confirmed by recent experience in the emerging Obamacare insurance exchanges.

The crux of the matter is what economists call the adverse-selection problem. Uninsured people with pre-existing conditions often face tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket medical costs annually. If insurers charged everyone the same rate, buying coverage would be far more attractive financially for people with chronic illnesses than for healthy people. And as healthy policyholders began dropping out of the insured pool, it would become increasingly composed of sick people, forcing insurers to raise their rates.

But higher rates make insurance even less attractive for healthy people, causing even more of them to drop out. Before long, coverage would become too expensive for almost everyone.

The adverse-selection problem explains why almost no countries leave health care provision to unregulated private insurance markets. It also predicts that requiring private insurance companies to charge the same rates to everyone will make it prohibitively expensive for most people to buy individual health insurance.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; communism; deathpanels; dictator; fascism; marxism; obama; obamacare; socialism; tyranny; unamerican; unconstitutional; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Every socialist ever spawned comes to the inevitable conclusion that there can be no escape, because people who are offered freedom tend to prefer it, and will even die to attain it. This particular individual is another sad demonstration of why you generally only find Marxist economists on campus - everywhere else, they're fired when their theories fail.

The current critique from the Left of America's health care system is that "only" the wealthy get the highest quality care, which is demonstrably untrue but that never stopped a Leftist from shouting it anyway. The system they're proposing to address this "economic injustice" will cost everyone more, lower the quality of care overall, place a great deal of power in the hands of those who ration it, and make the very highest quality of care available only to privileged classes, which tend to be - well, what do you know? - the wealthy. And loyal party members.

It's socialism when you can opt out, Communism when it's mandatory. And this commentator wants it to be mandatory.

41 posted on 08/03/2013 2:26:54 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

They just do not want to give the free market a chance. I remember back in the 80s car insurance was insane. One accident and you could be paying $5000 a year which was a massive amount of money back then. Now because of the free market they give you freakin’ discounts if you have an accident! “Oh we are raising your rates” oh well then I’ll go Geico or Progressive or this or that. Same with phones, I remember getting massive bills for landlines now it’s $40 a month unlimited calls. But health insurance? Noooo, lets keep that under the thumb of the government, lets keep allowing OGYNs to pay $300k a year in litigation insurance because some crackhead ho gave birth to a kid with flippers and some Obama voting jury awarded her $40million bucks.


42 posted on 08/03/2013 2:27:46 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
just PT but not full time... so much for union solidarity
43 posted on 08/03/2013 2:28:17 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Exactly. The real reform of health care industry won’t happen despite all the many ideas that have been proposed for the past 20-30 years, because it would hit the pockets of... lawyers, and who writes our laws and reforms? D’uh!


44 posted on 08/03/2013 2:30:49 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Obamacare will never collapse of its own weight, and must be specifically abolished from the books to rid ourselves of it. Anything less will result in an intergenerational usurpation of governmental power that will last generations, and may never be fully rectified, like many failed policies before it. Furthermore, the government is used to spending money that doesn’t exist, so we’d be deluding ourselves to think that “budgetary problems” will prevent the current crop of stalinists from instituting their wet dream.


45 posted on 08/03/2013 2:33:05 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

I have a feeling the Union bosses got the exemptions, not the people they “represent.”


46 posted on 08/03/2013 2:34:02 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“forced by the government”

This is the key to everything the left promotes ‘for the public good’. The only thing people are willing to embrace without the use of force is freedom, because the very definition of freedom is the absence of force or compulsion. This is another of those simple, black and white truths that exasperates the left, to whom everything is convoluted and complex, and ultimately subjective.


47 posted on 08/03/2013 2:34:32 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; FReepers; Patriots; FRiends; RedMDer; musicman; The Cajun; TheOldLady; DJ MacWoW; ...

Any Republican congresscritter who fails to do his utmost to defund/derail communist ObamaCare is a traitor who should be tarred and feathered and run outta Dodge on a rail!!




Abso-FReepin-lutely!

Let them know that we will remember in 2014 November!

Attend your townhall's and be Brietbart's!

Write, send emails, text massages and make your calls!

We can do this!

48 posted on 08/03/2013 2:34:50 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; RedMDer; The Cajun; musicman; DJ MacWoW; trisham; TheOldLady; Lady Jag; ...

LOL. I can’t believe I typed “ text massages,” but I did!
That’ll get the job done!!!!


49 posted on 08/03/2013 2:37:08 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well, that’s what the Soviets said to.


50 posted on 08/03/2013 2:38:19 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Not to fear, there will be subsidies for many people. Oh, you still will have to write a check for the full monthly insurance premium. But the government will catch you next time you file a tax return with a tax credit. So it’s dog food 11 months of the year.

The millennials will so not go for this. I guess they could just reduce deductions from their checks which could cause penalties and severely reduce tax revenue.


51 posted on 08/03/2013 2:38:48 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Fight the culture of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

So whats the problem with paying 20 grand a year for the third rate plan?

hmmm. So, I pay 20 grand a year to be covered, THEN MORE co pays and deductables and I use the insurance?

Whats not to like?


52 posted on 08/03/2013 2:39:02 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bttt


53 posted on 08/03/2013 2:39:52 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
no doubt...
54 posted on 08/03/2013 2:41:28 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Problem is, the kids are too ignorant and indoctrinated to know that the government is totally inept at running anything.


55 posted on 08/03/2013 2:42:28 PM PDT by dforest (BR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Just another attempt for the ‘haves’ to pay for the ‘have not’s.


56 posted on 08/03/2013 2:42:49 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Coverage for people with dire existing conditions isn’t insurance, it’s just a way to pay for their treatment. It may be what the country wants to do, but it is not insuring against potential loss if the probability of loss is 100%. It is just bearing the cost.


57 posted on 08/03/2013 2:43:54 PM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
We're already seeing the growth of "Concierge Medicine" where, for a fee, one can get enhanced medical services.

There is already a shortage of physicians in the US, and this is a result of decisions that were made regarding the supply of physicians 20 years ago. To undo it would take another 20 years. That's if they started tomorrow, and they haven't yet discovered that the supply of health care isn't elastic. Obamacare is destined to fail.

Following the "Law of Unintended Consequences", once Obamacare is fully implemented, there should be fewer people covered by health insurance and at a higher cost than was the case before.

58 posted on 08/03/2013 2:44:08 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: onyx
text massages

aweiner@rubbit.com

59 posted on 08/03/2013 2:44:49 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Should be interesting to see all the twenty and thirty something’s Obama worshipers when their mandatory premiums double.


60 posted on 08/03/2013 2:45:49 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson