Any scientific investigation will raise relevant questions and seek answers in a dispassionate and methodical manner. Ridicule of non-asserted conclusions is not relevant to a methodical scientific inquiry.
Asking questions is not stating conclusions. It is merely asking questions.
As to the evidence of hacking, Richard Clarke himself said you will never find evidence of hacking. The only evidence one can obtain on that front is testimony by the hacker himself.
I would like to the NSA files before agreeing with you. Especially with your signup date.
As if these reckless speculation threads on FR amount to any kind of “scientific inquiry”. Ha!
Without ridicule; there is no, methodical scientific inquiry, ms. mcsoup.