I cannot find any public records.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/nyregion/10weiner.html
Matt McKenna, a Clinton spokesman, told The Associated Press that Mr. Clinton would conduct the ceremony and was authorized to do so, but did not elaborate.
Then there is this:
Abedin/Weiner: A Marriage Made by Hillary Clinton and the Muslim Brotherhood?
Frontpage: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
I would like to talk to you today about Anthony Weiners marriage to his Muslim Brotherhood wife, Huma Abedin.
How is it exactly that a Muslim woman connected to the Muslim Brotherhood is married to a Jewish man? Something is not fitting here, right?
Spencer: Jamie, Islamic law prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, but not the other way around. This is yet another manifestation of Islamic supremacism: the idea is that a wife will become a member of her husbands household, and the children will follow the religion of the father. Thus, Muslim men marrying non-Muslim women ultimately enriches the Islamic community, while the non-Muslim community must forever be made to diminish.
Consequently, when a non-Muslim man begins a relationship with an observant Muslim woman, he is usually pressured to convert to Islam, and such conversion is made a condition of the marriage. Of course, laws are often honored in the breach, and this is not always true. So while we know that Huma Abedins parents were devout and observant Muslims indeed, her father was an imam we dont know what exactly is going on with her marriage to Anthony Weiner.
Certainly the most likely scenario is that Weiner did convert to Islam, as Abedins mother, a professor in Saudi Arabia, would almost certainly have insisted that he do so. Weiner has made no public statement of this conversion, but since it would almost certainly have cost him politically if he had announced it, this silence is not any indication that he didnt actually convert.
However, it is also possible, given the recent scandal involving Weiners apparently frequent and sexually charged contact with other women, that the rumors that the Abedin/Weiner union is a political marriage of convenience are true. After all, in 2008, Hillary Clinton was running for president. There were widespread insinuations that she was involved in a romantic and/or sexual relationship with Abedin, her ever-present personal assistant. Those whisperings persisted into Clintons tenure as Secretary of State. Abedins 2010 marriage to Weiner, at which Bill Clinton presided, put those rumors to rest.
In Islamic law, a Muslim must officiate a marriage ceremony; hence if Bill Clinton was the only one officiating, the marriage was not valid according to Islamic law. Huma Abedin would undoubtedly have known that. Thus, if no Muslim was officiating along with Clinton, Weiner would not have had to convert to Islam, as the whole thing was a charade from the outset, apparently entered into with the full awareness of all parties concerned.
(snip)
“I cannot find any public records.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/nyregion/10weiner.html
Matt McKenna, a Clinton spokesman, told The Associated Press that Mr. Clinton would conduct the ceremony and was authorized to do so, but did not elaborate.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks Maggief. Marriages are a matter of public record and civil/state law, are they not? If you can’t find it, nobody can.
Bill Clinton spokesman said Bill was “authorized.” Daily Caller, point blank, says he was not!
The event was officiated by Bill Clinton, even though according to state law Clinton could not legally perform the marriage.
How odd that the Daily Caller just drops this in their column, with no other comment or substantiation. Even odder (well...maybe not) that no journalist ever fact checked at the time of the wedding.
Muslim, not Muslim, are they legally married? We know they did file with the IRS as legally married. Hmmm.. What goes?
So either Clinton has a minister's license, or the actual marriage was performed by another official and the Clinton ceremony was just for show, or they aren't legally married.
Presumably it's the second -- somebody else actually performed the legal marrying on paper and Clinton was just there for show -- but why didn't the Clinton spokesmen just say so and why didn't the reporter look for an answer?
There's less in the Muslim angle. I can't see either of them converting. If either felt they needed to, they probably wouldn't have gotten married. Spencer is using the No True Scotsman fallacy, though in this case, "No True Muslim" is more like it.