Dean is opposed to IPAB on medical grounds.
The question I have is, is he for it on the grounds that it was intended? That is, is he for it on the grounds that it moves towards nationalizing the health care industry, entrenches ‘Rat power, doles out billions to ‘Rat supporting groups, unions, and the like? Does he support it on grounds that it furthers the destruction of the republic and the Constitution?
Still, he unwittingly finds himself squarely in the free market argument, simply based on the logic of medical ethics.
I suspect he'd go into instant spin mode if found out.