Posted on 07/26/2013 9:39:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Senior military personnel are considering now giving women different military training than men, The Washington Times reports.
The effort was proposed by Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Niki Tsongas at a recent House Armed Services Committee hearing because so far, she says training systems do not maximize the success of women.
Though the armed services have promised that combat standards will be the same regardless of gender, senior officers are considering initially separate training systems.
Army Lt. Gen. Howard Bromberg, serving as deputy chief of staff for personnel, considers separate training programs to be more about considering all soldiers as individuals, citing a need to explore how the training process works.
Were not looking at it just for the integration of women, Bromberg said. Were looking at it for the total soldier, because just as you have a 110-pound male who may lack some type of physiological capability or physical capability, he or she may both need to be trained differently. Were trying to expand our understanding of how we train.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
If one of those females is MY daughter I will hunt YOU down...
Just sayin’...
At least we had some hotties in the USAF. Now it’ll be like Ithaca or Berkeley women.
Are you saying me personally, or the enemy soldiers responsible?
They should go with Limbaugh’s All-American First Cavalry Amazon Battalion.
But seriously. This is population control. Thinly disguised.
Take women at their peak fertile years. Draft them. Mandate birth control shots (that will be in there somewhere), give them poor and substandard training and qualifications and then let them get killed or maimed or so psychologically disturbed they never recover.
It’s a win win.
Killing the women is the first thing those interested in genocide or eugenics do. The women have the babies.
Even with all the BS the Inner Party liked to fling (in Orwell’s ‘1984’) even O’Brien admits that they cut the chit when it comes to war-readiness.
But our Big Bro’ has apparently made it doctrine that military training and combat standards will be the same for men and women recruits.
At the same time, they will be different. Doublethink. No, this won’t end well for any troops depending on others in their squad; but in the spirit of doublethink, it will work out fine for those who may not be dependable themselves.
Anyone who thinks drafting MY daughter to get her blown up or raped is my enemy.
‘.’
The Soviets once thought doing this was a good idea....they very quickly found out it wasn’t.
21st Century Comfort Women???
For sure. That’s what they’ll end up as.
Well I think the blame would fall on those who commit those acts, and those who set our policy. My pointing out what would happen doesn’t make me responsible one bit.
The soviets weren’t obsessed with population control.
Our ‘leaders’ are.
At the very least the years our women would be required to serve would be childfree. Fewer opportunities for them to have babies overall. And sometimes those birth control shots are permanent. Depo is notorious in this regard.
The Draft will probably be back in a few years. I’ll give aid and comfort to any Draft Dodgers that I can.
Our military has turned into a politically correct tool to protect special interests who are pushing the New World Order.
Just remember with all the ‘liberal women will get what they deserve’ chortling you and others are doing on this thread there will be millions of girls who have NOT been raised by feminists and who are NOT feminists who will get killed, raped and maimed as well.
Just because YOU were mistreated and drafted (I am NOT a supporter of the draft for anyone of any chromosomal makeup) doesn’t mean it’s a great idea to mistreat someone else. Especially girls who have been raised to be homemakers and helpmeets for their husbands.
This has always been the liberals biggest failing: They think they know everything, so why have a plan B ready to go in case things fall apart.
lol. Come a shooting war, watch the pregnancy rate, real or imagined, skyrocket in the military!
There won’t be millions of girls drafted. They don’t have to register for selective service. My point was that they don’t want equality, they want the best of everything.(special treatment) Women shouldn’t be allowed in any combat role, let alone SpecOps.
I was never mistreated, nor was I drafted. I said I registered for selective service. I was born in 1975. I voluntarily joined the USAF. I also was never in combat.
that’s not what people are saying.
the point is they are going to die because they are going to get ‘women training’ and that is going to get them killed in combat, and it may mean others get killed because of that. this is not doing women any favors, or the men fighting beside them.
this is pc bullsh1t theater.
Oh I agree with the non combat/spec ops stuff. 100%.
That’s crazy talk. Only way they make that is by scrapping the qualifications. Estrogen doesn’t build muscles or or dense bones like testosterone does.
show me exactly where he said he wanted to draft your daughter and blow her up.
i think your comprehension is a little off tonight. his point was that it will probably take a lot of female casualites for the pc crap to be dropped and get women out of direct combat roles.
are you always taking every discusson as a personal attack? are you just on these threads to pick fights and be argumentative? nobody made it personal but you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.